On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 05:07:27PM -0700, Paul L. Allen wrote:
I just grabbed a copy of openssl-0.9.6d-beta1 and did the following
on an Alpha running RedHat 6.2 with gcc=egcs-2.91.66:
./config
make
make test
All of the tests succeeded. Are there bugs in the bignum code that
don't get
oh... on my alpha i've been consistently getting failures in the big num
test stuff for a while now...
that is using ./config and using gcc on redhat linux 6.0? for alpha -
though iirc the compiler is more recent possibly 2.95.3?
Sean
Paul L. Allen wrote:
Verdon Walker wrote:
What is the
Sean O'Riordain wrote:
oh... on my alpha i've been consistently getting failures in the big num
test stuff for a while now...
that is using ./config and using gcc on redhat linux 6.0? for alpha -
though iirc the compiler is more recent possibly 2.95.3?
Have you reported the failures?
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:08:27AM -0700, Paul L. Allen wrote:
Sean O'Riordain wrote:
oh... on my alpha i've been consistently getting failures in the big num
test stuff for a while now...
that is using ./config and using gcc on redhat linux 6.0? for alpha -
though iirc the
Paul L. Allen wrote:
Just a data point:
I just grabbed a copy of openssl-0.9.6d-beta1 and did the following
on an Alpha running RedHat 6.2 with gcc=egcs-2.91.66:
./config
make
make test
All of the tests succeeded. Are there bugs in the bignum code that
don't get caught by the test suite?
Verdon Walker wrote:
What is the status of support in OpenSSL for 64 bit architectures?
We are compiling our code for an Itanium box and are wondering how much
change may be required to get OpenSSL running as well.
It's been OK on the Alpha platform for over a year. I found and
submitted
