RE: Adding BF to tls WIN32 static linking of ssl libraries.

2000-05-08 Thread Shmuel Siegel
PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Adding BF to tls WIN32 static linking of ssl libraries. Is there anyway to add the BF (BlowFish) symmetric cipher to TLS, so that within a TLS session, randomly generated BF keys are used? For those paranoid with security, a "BF-SHA1&qu

Re: Adding BF to tls WIN32 static linking of ssl libraries.

2000-05-08 Thread Dr Stephen Henson
Eugene Levy wrote: Is there anyway to add the BF (BlowFish) symmetric cipher to TLS, so that within a TLS session, randomly generated BF keys are used? For those paranoid with security, a "BF-SHA1" cipher, with 256-448 bit random keys can be used. The current release of openssl-0.95a

Re: Adding BF to tls WIN32 static linking of ssl libraries.

2000-05-08 Thread Peter Gutmann
Dr Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It would be possible to add BF cipher suites giving them experimental numbers but ideally some "official" numbers should be used. There's an infintely-delayed informational RFC for BF which I have sitting on a machine somewhere, if it's required (to

Adding BF to tls WIN32 static linking of ssl libraries.

2000-05-07 Thread Eugene Levy
Is there anyway to add the BF (BlowFish) symmetric cipher to TLS, so that within a TLS session, randomly generated BF keys are used? For those paranoid with security, a "BF-SHA1" cipher, with 256-448 bit random keys can be used. The current release of openssl-0.95a doesn't seem to have a TLS