Sam Leffler wrote:
0.9.7 caused massive havoc compiling kerberos 4 (and to some extent 5) when
I integrated beta 3 into the freebsd tree. The crypt() macro was a minor
annoyance. The bigger problem was the redefinition of the DES key state
block (from array to struct). openbsd apparently
In message 00d501c264ae$1bf4f280$[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:10:47
-0700, Sam Leffler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
sam 0.9.7 caused massive havoc compiling kerberos 4 (and to some
sam extent 5) when I integrated beta 3 into the freebsd tree. The
sam crypt() macro was a minor annoyance.
In message 00d501c264ae$1bf4f280$[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:10:47
-0700, Sam Leffler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
sam 0.9.7 caused massive havoc compiling kerberos 4 (and to some extent 5) when
sam I integrated beta 3 into the freebsd tree. The crypt() macro was a minor
sam annoyance.
--- Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I'm assuming that you wouldn't complain about the removal of
crypt(). I can see your complaint about other things, but nothing
that answered my specific question.
I assume it is this bit in des_old.h which you are referring to
I get reports again that the crypt() macro gets in the way for some
applications. I'm strongly thinking of disabling it entirely. Anyone
against?
If I don't hear any complaints about the thought before the weekend,
I'll carry on with it, in 0.9.7 and 0.9.7-dev.
--
Richard Levitte \
]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:15 AM
Subject: Disabling the crypt() macro.
I get reports again that the crypt() macro gets in the way for some
applications. I'm strongly thinking of disabling it entirely. Anyone
against?
If I don't hear any complaints about the thought before