Yes, that's better.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:owner-openssl-dev@;openssl.org]On Behalf Of Richard Levitte - VMS
Whacker
Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 2:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fixes for some Windows build failures
In me
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 15 Nov 2002
02:28:11 +1100, "Steven Reddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
OK, I've committed fixes. Please try again tomorrow (the 1114
snapshot will be ready then).
smr> These are based on the 1113 snapshot. The first two are warnings, but the
smr> compiler
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 15 Nov 2002
02:28:11 +1100, "Steven Reddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
smr> These are based on the 1113 snapshot. The first two are warnings, but the
smr> compiler options being used treat warnings as errors.
smr>
smr> crypto/aes/aes_cbc.c at lines 84 and 1
These are based on the 1113 snapshot. The first two are warnings, but the
compiler options being used treat warnings as errors.
crypto/aes/aes_cbc.c at lines 84 and 106 need a typecast to avoid
signed/unsigned mismatch warning:
for(n=0; n < len; ++n)
becomes:
for(n=0; n < (int)len