In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:06:21
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen Sorry to say that but you didn't apply them correctly. It's not
vinschen
vinschen -march=486
vinschen
vinschen but
vinschen
vinschen -march=i486.
OK, fixed and
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:28:04AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:06:21
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen Sorry to say that but you didn't apply them correctly. It's not
vinschen
vinschen
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:23:57
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen First, there's a build problem which only affects Windows systems due
vinschen to the way DLLs are searched for. In contrast to Unixy systems, shared
vinschen libs are search in
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:12:11PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
vinschen -SET_SO_PATHS=LIBPATH=`cd ..; pwd`; LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$$LIBPATH;
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=$$LIBPATH; SHLIB_PATH=$$LIBPATH; \
vinschen - export LD_LIBRARY_PATH DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH SHLIB_PATH
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:25:57
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen Had it been an include file error, you would probably not have been
vinschen able to build...
vinschen
vinschen I'm still pretty confident that it's an include file problem.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:23:57
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen gcc -I. -I- -I.. -I../include
If you reinstall your older /usr/include/openssl, does the above work?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:23:57
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen First, there's a build problem which only affects Windows systems due
vinschen to the way DLLs are searched for. In contrast to Unixy systems, shared
vinschen libs are search in
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:49:17PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:23:57
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen First, there's a build problem which only affects Windows systems due
vinschen to the way DLLs are
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:21:31
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:49:17PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
vinschen In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002
13:23:57 +0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:35:53PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Are symlinks possible to do with Cygwin? If they are, I propose we do
it the same way as under Unix (where '.so.0.9.7' ends the file name.
In the Cygwin case, it would end with '.0.9.7.dll' instead...). That
way,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:46:40
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen That's exactly how it can't work. The DLL search algorithm is inside
vinschen of Windows and it doesn't work using symlinks (resp. shortcuts under
vinschen Windows) unfortunately.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:46:40
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen That's exactly how it can't work. The DLL search algorithm is inside
vinschen of Windows and it doesn't work using symlinks (resp. shortcuts under
vinschen Windows)
In message CMM.0.91.0.1037376855.jaltman@watsun on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:14:15 EST,
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jaltman OK, another question: does Windows DLLs have any version information
jaltman inside that's used for comparison, or is it just informative?
jaltman
jaltman The
OK, I'm applying your change of the DLL names. I've transfered that
naming to 0.9.8-dev (which has a different mechanism for building
shared libraries), do you have the possibility to check that the next
0.9.8-dev snapshot works as well (the name is
openssl-SNAL-2002mmdd.tar.gz)? No need to
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:46:40
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen That's exactly how it can't work. The DLL search algorithm is inside
vinschen of Windows and it
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:45:34PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
OK, I'm applying your change of the DLL names. I've transfered that
naming to 0.9.8-dev (which has a different mechanism for building
shared libraries), do you have the possibility to check that the next
0.9.8-dev
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:02:28AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
openssl-0.9.6-stable-SNAP-200211xx.tar.gz non-engine version
[...]
openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-200211xx.tar.gz
Hi,
a few problems.
The Configure script still uses the old deprecated -m486 instead of the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:53:03
+0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
vinschen The Configure script still uses the old deprecated -m486 instead of the
vinschen -march=i486 option:
Patch applied.
vinschen The Cygwin build script in the util subdir suffers
Test of snapshots for 13 November 2002
Tests that were performed:
- configuration and build
- test suite
- installation (be wise and do it in some temporary directory)
Optional things would be to test the following:
- build and run mod_ssl with the new installation
Using mod_ssl 2.8.12 and
Thanks for doing the tests. I discoevered the AES problem myself
yesterday, and I believe that the 1114 snapshot should work better, at
least in that respect, so if you're willing, I'd like you to do the
0.9.7 tests again.
And yes, the more platforms the merrier :-).
In message [EMAIL
As we're starting up our release process again, we'd need to have as
many as possible test the latest snapshots for us. I can personally
cover Debian GNU/Linux on i386.
--
0.9.6h:
One of the upcoming releases will be 0.9.6h (basically to fix all bugs
that have been
21 matches
Mail list logo
