[openssl.org #2202] Resolved: OpenSSL 0.9.8n v. VMS

2014-08-14 Thread Rich Salz via RT
According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing

[openssl.org #2202] OpenSSL 0.9.8n v. VMS

2014-08-14 Thread Rich Salz via RT
DrH applied the patches, VMS is supported and others are working on the build stuff. Closing this. -- Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org

RE: OpenSSL 0.9.8n v. VMS

2010-03-25 Thread Arpadffy Zoltan
Levitte. Thank you. Regards, Z -Original Message- From: Steven M. Schweda [mailto:s...@antinode.info] Sent: den 24 mars 2010 17:35 To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: OpenSSL 0.9.8n v. VMS An OpenSSL 0.9.8n kit which appears to work on VMS should be available at: http

[openssl.org #2202] OpenSSL 0.9.8n v. VMS

2010-03-25 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
My knowledge of VMS is minimal so I've just applied this patch as is. I made one change to stop libeay.num being overwritten on the next make update. Those hacks in mkdef.pl to manually add symbol information look like they should be handled more cleanly at some point. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N.

OpenSSL 0.9.8n v. VMS

2010-03-24 Thread Steven M. Schweda
An OpenSSL 0.9.8n kit which appears to work on VMS should be available at: http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8n/openssl-0_9_8n_s1.zip The suggested changes are the same as for 0.9.8m: http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8m/ Not amazingly, old complaints/questions persist: