http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0/test/tests.com
If you have a working bc on your VMS system:
http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0/test/bctest.com
http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0/test/bntest.com
http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0/test/tests.com
With
In message 10033109155129_20200...@antinode.info on Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:15:51
-0500 (CDT), Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode.info said:
sms 3. In the new crypto/whrlpool code, wp_block.c causes problems
sms on the VAX, where there is no 64-bit integer type to use for u64.
sms There seems
From: Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org
smsLooking through makevms.com, I noticed this:
sms
sms $ CONFIG_LOGICALS :=
NO_ASM,NO_RSA,NO_DSA,NO_DH,NO_MD2,NO_MD5,NO_RIPEMD,WHRLPOOL,-
sms
NO_SHA,NO_SHA0,NO_SHA1,NO_DES/NO_MDC2;NO_MDC2,NO_RC2,NO_RC4,NO_RC5,-
sms
From: Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org
I'm looking at it right now, and I'm reworking the whole thing to make
it more comprehensible for starters ;-)
I just noticed that this most recent set of spelling corrections
failed to deal with the instances of Agianst in the command
procedures.
http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0/openssl-1_0_0_s1.zip
Also, replacements for test/tests.com (could run all tests, but not
a single test), and test/testtsa.com (constructed multi-dot file
names, invalid on ODS2 file system).
Thanks for the reminder. I'm using this as a todo list right now, and
am dedicating some time for this this weekend.
Cheers,
Richard
In message 10033022453670_20200...@antinode.info on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:45:36
-0500 (CDT), Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode.info said:
sms From: Dr. Stephen
From: Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org
Thanks for the reminder. I'm using this as a todo list right now, and
am dedicating some time for this this weekend.
For a good time:
http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0/openssl-1_0_0_s1.zip
I haven't tried it elsewhere yet, but that
3. In the new crypto/whrlpool code, wp_block.c causes problems
on the VAX, where there is no 64-bit integer type to use for u64.
There seems to be code in there which pretends that the size of u64 is
open to discussion (sizeof(u64)), but it seems (to me) to be pretty
clear that other
Hello,
I am happy that 1.0.0 is released. Thank you all for the hard work and time
spent for the community.
I was really hoping and looking for a VMS ready 1.0.0 release.
Some of us have sent many patches, suggestions - unfortunately, not all of
those changes have got through to the released
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010, Arpadffy Zoltan wrote:
Hello,
I am happy that 1.0.0 is released. Thank you all for the hard work and time
spent for the community.
I was really hoping and looking for a VMS ready 1.0.0 release. Some of us
have sent many patches, suggestions - unfortunately, not all
From: Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org
Have any of these patches been sent to the request tracker?
A similar question was raised back around 12-NOV-2009:
Can you (and others in this thread) please submit bug fix patches to the
request tracker (r...@openssl.org) so they don't get
11 matches
Mail list logo