Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007, Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
--On Jun 12, 2007 18:28:49 +0200 Nanno Langstraat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
v2 of the SHA save patch.
Is there a special reason to limit it to SHA ?
Why not a EVP_MD_CTX_{load|save} ?
That would b
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007, Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
> --On Jun 12, 2007 18:28:49 +0200 Nanno Langstraat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >v2 of the SHA save patch.
>
> Is there a special reason to limit it to SHA ?
> Why not a EVP_MD_CTX_{load|save} ?
>
That would be the preferred option since we've
--On Jun 12, 2007 18:28:49 +0200 Nanno Langstraat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
v2 of the SHA save patch.
Is there a special reason to limit it to SHA ?
Why not a EVP_MD_CTX_{load|save} ?
Goetz
--
DMCA: The greed of the few outweights the freedom of the many
pgpFVb5vOyptj.pgp
Description: PGP
v2 of the SHA save patch.
Now against the top level of the source tree.
* Now lets user alloc the buffer.
* '_Default_Version()' call added.
* Man page documentation added.
Nanno
diff -Nru ../openssl-0.9.8e/crypto/sha/sha.h crypto/sha/sha.h
--- ../openssl-0.9.8e/crypto/sha/sha.h 2