#2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 12:08
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
May
#2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 12:08
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
May
, September 16, 2010 8:46 AM
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: RE: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
Just one idea, which popped up today.
What about of using UuidCreate() function, see:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa379205(VS.85).aspx
In our case, our software runs
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 23:33
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
I agree that OPENSSL_isservice() cannot be changed
May be there is another method to check wether a windows
process is a service, without using user32.dll.
As mentioned one can do it with Native NT API, but it's quite
special and belongs rather in [your] application than in
openssl.
Yes and no. As soon as there is any openSSL code, using
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 12:08
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
May be there is another method to check wether a windows
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 23:33
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
I agree that OPENSSL_isservice() cannot be changed
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 12:08
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
May be there is another method to check wether a windows
I agree that OPENSSL_isservice() cannot be changed,
??? My suggestion for *you* was to modify it to unconditionally
return 1...
Our application can both run in foreground and in service
context. So
simply changing to return 1 is not possible.
If changing to return 1 is not acceptable, how
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 22:48
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
I agree that OPENSSL_isservice() cannot be changed
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 22:48
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
I agree that OPENSSL_isservice() cannot be changed
I agree that OPENSSL_isservice() cannot be changed,
??? My suggestion for *you* was to modify it to unconditionally
return 1...
Our application can both run in foreground and in service context. So
simply changing to return 1 is not possible.
If changing to return 1 is not acceptable, how
I agree that OPENSSL_isservice() cannot be changed,
??? My suggestion for *you* was to modify it to
unconditionally return 1...
Our application can both run in foreground and in service context. So simply
changing to return 1 is not possible.
May be there is another method to check
I agree that OPENSSL_isservice() cannot be changed,
??? My suggestion for *you* was to modify it to
unconditionally return 1...
Our application can both run in foreground and in service context. So simply
changing to return 1 is not possible.
May be there is another method to check
I agree that OPENSSL_isservice() cannot be changed,
??? My suggestion for *you* was to modify it to unconditionally return 1...
but you can
decide to log an event always.
... so that messages will be forced to event log.
So all if (OPENSSL_isservice()) can be
removed. Or change it to a
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 22:23
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
When building openSSL on Windows with:
* CONFIG
-Original Message-
From: Kees Dekker
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 22:53
To: 'r...@openssl.org'
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: RE: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org
-Original Message-
From: Kees Dekker
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 22:53
To: 'r...@openssl.org'
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: RE: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org
2010/3/16, Kees Dekker via RT wrote:
* I saw a lot of NT4 code. It may be worth to consider that Windows
2000 is not supported by Microsoft anymore for many years (see
http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3071). You may
like to drop some ancient Windows flavors? It will save code
When building openSSL on Windows with:
* CONFIG=VC-WIN64A or CONFIG=VC-WIN32
* no-shared no-threads -DWINVER==0x0501 -D_CRT_NON_CONFORMING_SWPRINTFS
* With Visual Studio 2005
I get dependencies to user32.dll, when using libeay32.lib, e.g:
2libeay32.lib(rand_win.obj) :
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 22:23
To: Kees Dekker
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2194] Unwanted dependencies to user32.dll
When building openSSL on Windows with:
* CONFIG
21 matches
Mail list logo
