On Mon 16 Jun 2014 06:39:40 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 02:10:14AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Mon 28 Apr 2014 09:32:40 Salz, Rich wrote:
> > > > While rpaths are not needed in some contexts, they are important in
> > > > others, please do not remove rpath support.
> >
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 02:10:14AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon 28 Apr 2014 09:32:40 Salz, Rich wrote:
> > > While rpaths are not needed in some contexts, they are important in
> > > others, please do not remove rpath support.
> > Yes, such as cross-compiling or embedded systems. I think
On Mon 28 Apr 2014 09:32:40 Salz, Rich wrote:
> > While rpaths are not needed in some contexts, they are important in
> > others, please do not remove rpath support.
> Yes, such as cross-compiling or embedded systems. I think it's reasonable
> to make it a config option tho.
eh ? rpaths are not
On Fri 06 Jun 2014 09:15:09 Kurt Roeckx via RT wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:27:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thu 05 Jun 2014 22:53:32 Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> > > On Sun Apr 27 13:04:20 2014, vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
> > > > It's a standard setting that other build systems use
On Fri 06 Jun 2014 09:15:09 Kurt Roeckx via RT wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:27:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thu 05 Jun 2014 22:53:32 Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> > > On Sun Apr 27 13:04:20 2014, vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
> > > > It's a standard setting that other build systems use
> I think this misses the point, one can already just pass a table entry on the
> command-line as a colon-separated target name.
Yes, you're right, I was mis-using the thread.
But putting a config spec on the command line is, shall we say, awkward. And
adding the flag would help with code clea
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 10:42:06AM -0400, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Perhaps Configure should have a "-f nnn" flag, that lets folks
> add their own local table without having to patch the script
I think this misses the point, one can already just pass a table
entry on the command-line as a colon-separat
penssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 10:31 AM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3331] [PATCH] respect LDFLAGS during build
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:15:02AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I ended up using
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:15:02AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I ended up using the cflags in Configure for that.
I wrote a script that takes the output of "Configure TABLE" to
extract the settings for my desired target, makes appropriate
additions to the desired field, and then runs "Configure"
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:27:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thu 05 Jun 2014 22:53:32 Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> > On Sun Apr 27 13:04:20 2014, vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
> > > It's a standard setting that other build systems use.
> >
> > Can you explain why you need this?
>
> because peo
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:27:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thu 05 Jun 2014 22:53:32 Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> > On Sun Apr 27 13:04:20 2014, vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
> > > It's a standard setting that other build systems use.
> >
> > Can you explain why you need this?
>
> because peo
On Thu 05 Jun 2014 22:53:32 Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> On Sun Apr 27 13:04:20 2014, vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
> > It's a standard setting that other build systems use.
>
> Can you explain why you need this?
because people want to set custom linker flags. `man ld` shows quite a large
number tha
On Thu 05 Jun 2014 22:53:32 Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> On Sun Apr 27 13:04:20 2014, vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
> > It's a standard setting that other build systems use.
>
> Can you explain why you need this?
because people want to set custom linker flags. `man ld` shows quite a large
number tha
> While rpaths are not needed in some contexts, they are important in others,
> please do not remove rpath support.
Yes, such as cross-compiling or embedded systems. I think it's reasonable to
make it a config option tho.
/r$
--
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technologies, Cambr
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 02:08:12PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx via RT wrote:
> But then I think think that we shouldn't have rpaths in the first
> place, so I wouldn't have a problem with removing the rpath.
While rpaths are not needed in some contexts, they are important
in others, please do not remove r
On Sun 27 Apr 2014 14:08:12 Kurt Roeckx via RT wrote:
> > -DO_GNU_APP=LDFLAGS="$(CFLAGS) -Wl,-rpath,$(LIBRPATH)"
> > +DO_GNU_APP=LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)"
>
> Shouldn't that be this?
> +DO_GNU_APP=LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS) -Wl,-rpath,$(LIBRPATH)"
i didn't mean to include dropping of the rpath in t
On Sun 27 Apr 2014 14:08:12 Kurt Roeckx via RT wrote:
> > -DO_GNU_APP=LDFLAGS="$(CFLAGS) -Wl,-rpath,$(LIBRPATH)"
> > +DO_GNU_APP=LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)"
>
> Shouldn't that be this?
> +DO_GNU_APP=LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS) -Wl,-rpath,$(LIBRPATH)"
i didn't mean to include dropping of the rpath in t
> -DO_GNU_APP=LDFLAGS="$(CFLAGS) -Wl,-rpath,$(LIBRPATH)"
> +DO_GNU_APP=LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)"
Shouldn't that be this?
+DO_GNU_APP=LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS) -Wl,-rpath,$(LIBRPATH)"
But then I think think that we shouldn't have rpaths in the first
place, so I wouldn't have a problem with removing
18 matches
Mail list logo
