Re: apps\ca Y2K bug (what i use for ynk bug)

1999-12-21 Thread Erik Aronesty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 20, 1999 12:47 AM Subject: RE: apps\ca Y2K bug I have got the point. If YY is less than 50, the year shall be interpreted as 20YY. Thank you for the accurate guidance. Best regards. Nelson. -Original Message- From: Dr

RE: apps\ca Y2K bug

1999-12-20 Thread Nelson A Silva F
] Subject:Re: apps\ca Y2K bug Nelson Alves da Silva Filho wrote: POSSIBLE bug regarding the ca application (OpenSSL-0.9.4). I think the function ASN1_UTCTIME_set_string (a_utctm.c) is not Y2K safe and, consequently, the "startdate" and "enddate" entries of op

Re: apps\ca Y2K bug

1999-12-18 Thread Massimiliano Pala
Nelson Alves da Silva Filho wrote: POSSIBLE bug regarding the ca application (OpenSSL-0.9.4). I think the function ASN1_UTCTIME_set_string (a_utctm.c) is not Y2K safe and, consequently, the "startdate" and "enddate" entries of openssl.cnf ca section as well. Nelson. I ave tested it

Re: apps\ca Y2K bug

1999-12-17 Thread Dr Stephen Henson
Nelson Alves da Silva Filho wrote: POSSIBLE bug regarding the ca application (OpenSSL-0.9.4). I think the function ASN1_UTCTIME_set_string (a_utctm.c) is not Y2K safe and, consequently, the "startdate" and "enddate" entries of openssl.cnf ca section as well. Check out the description of