[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 1999 12:47 AM
Subject: RE: apps\ca Y2K bug
I have got the point. If YY is less than 50, the year shall be interpreted
as 20YY.
Thank you for the accurate guidance.
Best regards.
Nelson.
-Original Message-
From: Dr
]
Subject:Re: apps\ca Y2K bug
Nelson Alves da Silva Filho wrote:
POSSIBLE bug regarding the ca application (OpenSSL-0.9.4).
I think the function ASN1_UTCTIME_set_string (a_utctm.c) is not Y2K safe and,
consequently, the "startdate" and "enddate" entries of op
Nelson Alves da Silva Filho wrote:
POSSIBLE bug regarding the ca application (OpenSSL-0.9.4).
I think the function ASN1_UTCTIME_set_string (a_utctm.c) is not Y2K safe and,
consequently, the "startdate" and "enddate" entries of openssl.cnf ca section as well.
Nelson.
I ave tested it
Nelson Alves da Silva Filho wrote:
POSSIBLE bug regarding the ca application (OpenSSL-0.9.4).
I think the function ASN1_UTCTIME_set_string (a_utctm.c) is not Y2K safe and,
consequently, the "startdate" and "enddate" entries of openssl.cnf ca section as well.
Check out the description of