> Actually it should also be noted that snippet presented in originally
> mentioned
> http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2016-September/030151.html
> is actually compiles as just
>
> _intel_fast_memset(args)
>
> by Intel compiler 17.0 (a.k.a. 2017).
Second look at code generated by
>> We do have assembler versions for most CPI's.
>
> In the context one can also add that the kind of optimization that could
> omit memset invocation *has to* rely on deep inter-procedural
> *multi-file* analysis. If compiler is given mem_clr.c alone, and it
> doesn't look at it when compiling
> We do have assembler versions for most CPI's.
In the context one can also add that the kind of optimization that could
omit memset invocation *has to* rely on deep inter-procedural
*multi-file* analysis. If compiler is given mem_clr.c alone, and it
doesn't look at it when compiling other
We do have assembler versions for most CPI's.
Closing ticket.
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4684
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
We do have assembler versions for most CPI's.
Closing ticket.
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
