On 20/04/17 21:24, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 12:14 +, Salz, Rich via openssl-dev wrote:
>>> Out of curiosity, what's the ETA for TLS 1.3?
>>> [1] mentions April 5 as the release date (which was two weeks ago).
>>>
>>> [1]:
On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 12:14 +, Salz, Rich via openssl-dev wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, what's the ETA for TLS 1.3?
> > [1] mentions April 5 as the release date (which was two weeks ago).
> >
> > [1]: https://blogs.akamai.com/2017/01/tls-13-ftw.html
>
> That's an akamai blog, not an openssl
There is motion towards a 2.4.26 release around month end, give or take two
weeks.
On Apr 19, 2017 4:57 PM, "Kurt Roeckx" wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 02:57:13PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> >
> > > Am 19.04.2017 um 14:14 schrieb Salz, Rich via openssl-dev <
>
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 02:57:13PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> > Am 19.04.2017 um 14:14 schrieb Salz, Rich via openssl-dev
> > :
> >
> >> Out of curiosity, what's the ETA for TLS 1.3?
> >> [1] mentions April 5 as the release date (which was two weeks ago).
> >>
>
> Am 19.04.2017 um 14:14 schrieb Salz, Rich via openssl-dev
> :
>
>> Out of curiosity, what's the ETA for TLS 1.3?
>> [1] mentions April 5 as the release date (which was two weeks ago).
>>
>> [1]: https://blogs.akamai.com/2017/01/tls-13-ftw.html
>
> That's an akamai
> Out of curiosity, what's the ETA for TLS 1.3?
> [1] mentions April 5 as the release date (which was two weeks ago).
>
> [1]: https://blogs.akamai.com/2017/01/tls-13-ftw.html
That's an akamai blog, not an openssl statement :) And that post is
misleading, it should have said "available" not