or not.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jim Sahaj
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #479] support version independent upgrade
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 27 Jan 2003
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 27 Jan 2003 23:33:24
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Actually, I'd prefer that I wouldn't have to relink and
rt redistribute my application every time a security patch comes out
rt for OpenSSL. I haven't seen any issues in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 27 Jan 2003 23:33:24
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Actually, I'd prefer that I wouldn't have to relink and
rt redistribute my application every time a security patch comes out
rt for OpenSSL. I haven't seen any issues in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:40:24
+0100 (MET), via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Currently, on many Unix platforms I link my application against
rt libssl.so and libcrypto.so. Typically, these are links set to resolve
rt down to the versioned types of these files, like
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:40:24
+0100 (MET), via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Currently, on many Unix platforms I link my application against
rt libssl.so and libcrypto.so. Typically, these are links set to resolve
rt down to the versioned types of these files,
