Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-02-22 Thread Steven M. Schweda
Some newer stuff (again), now: Complete source kit: http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/openssl-0_9_8j_s7.zip gdiff -ru openssl-0.9.8j openssl-0_9_8j : http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/0_9_8j_s7.dru Notes (included in the source kit): http://antinode.info

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-02-04 Thread Steven M. Schweda
>Complete source kit: > http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/openssl-0_9_8j_s6.zip > >Well, I'm gettin' close. > > http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/makevms.com > http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/apps/makeapps.com One more oops (all my fault):

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-02-03 Thread Steven M. Schweda
>Complete source kit: > http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/openssl-0_9_8j_s6.zip Well, I'm gettin' close. http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/makevms.com http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/apps/makeapps.com I left out a file attribute change from makevms

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-02-03 Thread Steven M. Schweda
>Some stuff is in: > > http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/ Some newer stuff, now: Complete source kit: http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/openssl-0_9_8j_s6.zip gdiff -ru openssl-0.9.8j openssl-0_9_8j : http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/0_9_8j_s6.dr

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-01-13 Thread Ger Hobbelt
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Steven M. Schweda wrote: > Before I forget, is there some good reason not to have the usual > > #ifndef _OPENSSLCONF_H > # define _OPENSSLCONF_H > > #endif /* ndef _OPENSSLCONF_H */ > > guards in "opensslconf.h"? Well, yes, there is. (I ran into this issue my

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-01-12 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Richard Levitte > - produce Unix diffs for all your changes. If you have GNU diff on > your machine, that should be fairly simple. It's getting GNU diff that requires the effort. > - zip the changed files into an archive. Some stuff is in: http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-01-12 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: "Green, Paul" > Disclaimer: I am not a VMS person. But I have done a lot of work with > configuration scripts over the years. In my opinion, your code would be > much more future-proof if you made positive tests than negative tests. > E.g., "if alpha or ia64" rather than "if not vax". > >

RE: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-01-12 Thread Green, Paul
Disclaimer: I am not a VMS person. But I have done a lot of work with configuration scripts over the years. In my opinion, your code would be much more future-proof if you made positive tests than negative tests. E.g., "if alpha or ia64" rather than "if not vax". Perhaps you know that the VMS worl

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-01-12 Thread Richard Levitte
Yes, it is very interesting, thanks for doing the work! There are two alternatives: - produce Unix diffs for all your changes. If you have GNU diff on your machine, that should be fairly simple. - zip the changed files into an archive. Whichever alternative you use, please send the result to