On Thu, Jul 06, 2000, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> From: Charlene Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Charlene.Yee> I doubt this is a bug, am I missing anything on my machine? If
> Charlene.Yee> so how do I fix this. I already ran ./config
> [...]
> Charlene.Yee> /usr/ucb/cc: language optio
From: Charlene Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Charlene.Yee> I doubt this is a bug, am I missing anything on my machine? If
Charlene.Yee> so how do I fix this. I already ran ./config
[...]
Charlene.Yee> /usr/ucb/cc: language optional software package not installed
That line should be clear enough, no
From: "Cayleb Darkstar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Proxima.Centauri> In file included from /usr/include/errno.h:36,
Proxima.Centauri> from ../include/openssl/err.h:82,
Proxima.Centauri> from cryptlib.h:74,
Proxima.Centauri> from cryptlib.c:61:
Proxima.C
Joe O'Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> a suse 6.2 linux system [...]. I get the same make error each time.
> (cd asm; /usr/bin/perl sha1-586.pl cpp >sx86unix.cpp)
> gcc -E -DELF asm/sx86unix.cpp | as -o asm/sx86-elf.o
> gcc: asm/sx86unix.cpp: linker input file unused since linking not done
What
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 02:26:57PM -, Joe O'Reilly wrote:
> Thanks in advance for any halp you may be able to give!
As described in http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#7
you can use the "no-asm" option as an immediate fix.
> gcc -E -DELF asm/mx86unix.cpp | as -o asm/mx86-elf.o
> gcc: as
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> jonessk> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
>
> That's a SIGSEGV. What version of gcc was that?
>
> There are two things that I can think of that you might need to do:
>
> 1. free up memory. that signal
jonessk> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
That's a SIGSEGV. What version of gcc was that?
There are two things that I can think of that you might need to do:
1. free up memory. that signal could be because it ran out of swap
space.
2. upgrade gcc, it migh
Ulf Möller wrote:
>
> > If people want to develop or use snapshots, then they should have Perl.
>
> I don't think we should make it more difficult for people to try the
> snapshots. There already are enough problems that are only noticed
> in the release versions.
>
> I mean, we even have the m
> If people want to develop or use snapshots, then they should have Perl.
I don't think we should make it more difficult for people to try the
snapshots. There already are enough problems that are only noticed
in the release versions.
I mean, we even have the makedepend output in the CVS, even t
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> ben> Are you saying Perl doesn't run on VMS?
>
> Perl runs on VMS, but isn't commonly installed (yet). I did a poll
> right after the release of 0.9.4, when I noticed the missing
> obj_dat.h, and the common response from most people in the VMS
> communit
ben> Are you saying Perl doesn't run on VMS?
Perl runs on VMS, but isn't commonly installed (yet). I did a poll
right after the release of 0.9.4, when I noticed the missing
obj_dat.h, and the common response from most people in the VMS
community was that it would be quite annoying to install Per
> > Errr ... why?
that was my first reaction too:-)
>
> Because it fails so often (we've had one example for Windows and one
> example for Unix this week),
but what happens anyway?
> and because VMS needs it (or some other
> solution) anyway.
as well as MacOS...
andy.
___
Ulf Möller wrote:
>
> > Errr ... why?
>
> Because it fails so often (we've had one example for Windows and one
> example for Unix this week), and because VMS needs it (or some other
> solution) anyway.
Are you saying Perl doesn't run on VMS?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
> Errr ... why?
Because it fails so often (we've had one example for Windows and one
example for Unix this week), and because VMS needs it (or some other
solution) anyway.
__
OpenSSL Project http:/
ulf> Maybe we should put obj_dat.h back under CVS control, fix the dots in
ulf> objects.h as Anonymous proposed some time ago, and run obj_dat.pl as
ulf> part of "make update".
ulf>
ulf> Any objections?
No. None at all. Nope. Please do :-).
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL
Ulf Möller wrote:
>
> > obj_dat.c: In function `OBJ_nid2obj':
> > obj_dat.c:263: `NUM_NID' undeclared (first use this function)
>
> Maybe we should put obj_dat.h back under CVS control, fix the dots in
> objects.h as Anonymous proposed some time ago, and run obj_dat.pl as
> part of "make update"
> obj_dat.c: In function `OBJ_nid2obj':
> obj_dat.c:263: `NUM_NID' undeclared (first use this function)
Maybe we should put obj_dat.h back under CVS control, fix the dots in
objects.h as Anonymous proposed some time ago, and run obj_dat.pl as
part of "make update".
Any objections?
__
Bill Wandrack schrieb:
>
> make error:
>
> gcc -DMONOLITH -I../include -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DRSAref -DL_ENDIAN
> -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 -Wall -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM
> -DRMD160_ASM -c openssl.c -o openssl.o
> rm -f openssl
> gcc -o openssl -DMONOLITH -I../include -DTHREADS -D_
18 matches
Mail list logo
