On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Bar, Eitan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm considering porting OpenSSL to a RTOS, and would like to hear about
> people's experience with such a task.
>
>
>
> - How portable exactly is OpenSSL? Are all OS and platform specific
> definitions and wrappers(?)
Hi Eitan,
- How portable exactly is OpenSSL? Are all OS and platform specific
definitions and wrappers(?) placed in a single place or is this going to
require changing the code all-over?
Basically OpenSSL is portable to any RTOS and the complexity depends on the
compiler and the options that we
P. George wrote:
i am trying to get the following little hello-world ssl sample to run
on win32 using winsock2:
http://www.uweb.ucsb.edu/~jramrus/stuff/NetProgs/ssl_server.c
it compiles and runs fine on my os x machine. however, when i take
the same code and drag it over to windows and add a cal
P. George wrote:
i am trying to get the following little hello-world ssl sample to run on
win32 using winsock2:
http://www.uweb.ucsb.edu/~jramrus/stuff/NetProgs/ssl_server.c
it compiles and runs fine on my os x machine. however, when i take the
same code and drag it over to windows and add a ca
Why is MatrixSSL so *very much* smaller than OpenSSL? Which features account for the
extra "700KB" or whatever? I'm probably not using them
- Martin Kochanski.
At 15:56 21/07/04 -0700, J Harper wrote:
>Gary,
>
>MatrixSSL might be a good alternative, it's designed to be easily portable
>and
Gary,
MatrixSSL might be a good alternative, it's designed to be easily portable
and I believe only uses callbacks with parameters in one spot (for X.509
certificate validation). Var args are also not used in any of the APIs,
which may help if your compiler is less than ANSI compliant.. The libr
Thus spake "Gary Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have been working on porting OpenSSL to the THEOS Operating System.
> The C compiler is ANSI C compliant and "mostly" ISO C99 compliant.
> However, it is not as feature rich as GCC. . My main problem is with the
> function pointer callbacks that a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:00:15 -0600, "Gary Walters"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
garwal> I have been working on porting OpenSSL to the THEOS Operating
garwal> System. The C compiler is ANSI C compliant and "mostly" ISO
garwal> C99 compliant. However, it is not as feat
> I need the crypto portion.
>
> I have found the SSLEay 0.8.1 port to PalmOS. Is this the port you are
> talking about?
Yes, probably.
> What are the problems you faced? What are limitations of
> PalmOS you faced?
IIRC we had two problems. Each program was limited to 64kB and JMP was
limited
.
..Ram
From: Arne Ansper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Porting OpenSSL to Palm OS
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:09:22 +0200 (FLE Standard Time)
> I need OpenSSL on Palm OS. I have searched the archives and have found
some
> r
> I need OpenSSL on Palm OS. I have searched the archives and have found some
> references to people attempting to port to Palm OS.
>
> Has anyone ported it? What state is it in? And what problems did anyone
> face porting it to Palm?
The folks who wrote TopGun SSH ported enough of SSLEAY to P
> I need OpenSSL on Palm OS. I have searched the archives and have found some
> references to people attempting to port to Palm OS.
>
> Has anyone ported it? What state is it in? And what problems did anyone face
> porting it to Palm?
What parts do you need? Porting the complete OpenSSL is quite
If you are going to be supporint OS/2, I recommend that you start by
incorporating the OS/2 patches that Dirk Ohme wrote for the IBM
compiler. I've been using them on OS/2 for some time now and would be
interested in working with you on the OS/2 support.
> Hi,
>
> I am in the process of port
> Sounds great. Do you have a url for the patches as I did not notice
> them in the distribution.
they aren't in the distribution. I have a copy. I will send you a
URL to get them privately.
> BTW the Watcom compiler is going opensource:
>
> http://www.openwatcom.org
>
> Considering that I
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/15/00
at 10:05 AM, Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>If you are going to be supporint OS/2, I recommend that you start by
>incorporating the OS/2 patches that Dirk Ohme wrote for the IBM compiler.
>I've been using them on OS/2 for some time now and would
15 matches
Mail list logo
