In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 08 Dec 2002 10:24:49
-0500, Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
geoff> Hmm ... I'd say that was probably not a wise idea given how
geoff> long 0.9.7 has been in beta already. Building of
Good point...
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL P
On December 8, 2002 04:35 am, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 8 Dec
> 2002 10:31:46 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> levitte> Log:
> levitte> Since it's defined in draft-ietf-tls-compression-04.txt,
> let's make levitte> ZLIB a known compr
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 8 Dec 2002 10:31:46
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
levitte> Log:
levitte> Since it's defined in draft-ietf-tls-compression-04.txt, let's make
levitte> ZLIB a known compression method, with the identity 1.
Quite honestly, I'm wondering if I shoul
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 14 Aug 2002
13:07:15 +0200, Bodo Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
moeller> On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:52:37PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
moeller>
moeller> > bodo> bodo14-Aug-2002 12:49:35
moeller> > bodo>
moeller> > bodo> Modif
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:52:37PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> bodo> bodo14-Aug-2002 12:49:35
> bodo>
> bodo> Modified:.CHANGES
> bodo> Log:
> bodo> add 'TODO' items
> Don't these go into the STATUS file, usually?
Only when noone is really working on
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:49:35
+0200 (MET DST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bodo> bodo14-Aug-2002 12:49:35
bodo>
bodo> Modified:.CHANGES
bodo> Log:
bodo> add 'TODO' items
Don't these go into the STATUS file, usually?
--
Richard Levitte \ S
This time it really is my reply and not Richard's :-)
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Ben Laurie wrote:
> I think you have some weird kind of aesthetics. A change is a change,
> and it may was well be a clear one - adding a 1 on the end doesn't make
> it clear why a non-standard name was used. Prepending a
Geoff Thorpe wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Richard's standard mail address is on sick-leave due to some server hardware
> failures. He's asked me to forward this to the list on his behalf (ie. the
> response is his, not mine, but I agree with what he's said anyhow).
>
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, [iso-885
Hi there,
Richard's standard mail address is on sick-leave due to some server hardware
failures. He's asked me to forward this to the list on his behalf (ie. the
response is his, not mine, but I agree with what he's said anyhow).
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, [iso-8859-1] Götz Babin-Ebell wrote:
> [EMAI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> levitte 29-Mar-2001 09:45:09
>
> Modified:crypto/des Tag: OpenSSL_0_9_6-stable xcbc_enc.c speed.c
> pcbc_enc.c ofb_enc.c ofb64enc.c ncbc_enc.c
> ede_cbcm_enc.c ecb_enc.c des_opts.c des_enc.c des.h
>
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
levitte> kssl.h and lack of Kerberos 5 library breaks compilation of any
levitte> application with OpenSSL.
And there was potential for more, like you could find "#ifdef MPE" in
an exported header with "MPE" being defined only when building
From: Ulf Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ulf> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ulf>
ulf> > with "OPENSSL_" to avoid conflicts with other packages and by making
ulf> > sure e_os2.h will cover all platform-specific cases together with
ulf> > opensslconf.h.
ulf>
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> with "OPENSSL_" to avoid conflicts with other packages and by making
> sure e_os2.h will cover all platform-specific cases together with
> opensslconf.h.
Where does that come from??
Renaming all the macros is going to brea
13 matches
Mail list logo
