On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 10:12:00PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> O.K., I have now started: SSL_new now copies ctx->cert (formerly known
> as ctx->default_cert, but now it is no more a default than various
> other members of SSL_CTX that have always been copied during SSL_new),
> and s->ctx->[defau
Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I guess we start with your suggestion above and see what kind of mess we
> have left afterwards?
O.K., I have now started: SSL_new now copies ctx->cert (formerly known
as ctx->default_cert, but now it is no more a default than various
other members of SSL_CTX th
Bodo Moeller wrote:
>
> Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Bodo Moeller:
>
> >> It appears to me that while it is reasonable to employ the same
> >> cert_st structure for SSL_CTX's and SSL's (if the inconsistencies in
> >> the current code are removed, as I suggested in the first paragraph),
>
Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bodo Moeller:
>> It appears to me that while it is reasonable to employ the same
>> cert_st structure for SSL_CTX's and SSL's (if the inconsistencies in
>> the current code are removed, as I suggested in the first paragraph),
>> the re-use of cert_st for sessions
Bodo Moeller wrote:
> It appears to me that while it is reasonable to employ the same
> cert_st structure for SSL_CTX's and SSL's (if the inconsistencies in
> the current code are removed, as I suggested in the first paragraph),
> the re-use of cert_st for sessions makes not a lot of sense
> altog
