Re: Windows folks -- comment on this patch for RT 2301?

2014-09-18 Thread Pierre DELAAGE
I am programming in win32 for years, still today. The patch seems relevant, compliant with MS guidelines on Bitmaps manipulations. Anyway, it is documented that other memory allocation than VirtualAlloc for use with getdibits is not safe :

Re: Windows folks -- comment on this patch for RT 2301?

2014-09-18 Thread Pierre DELAAGE
I meant in fact that calling two times getdibits could have given the necessary info to, then, allocate the proper buffer, instead of using getobject. Getdibits does not return a new pointer by itself. Sorry for the mistake. Le 18/09/2014 12:49, Pierre DELAAGE a écrit : GetDibits COULD also

RE: Windows folks -- comment on this patch for RT 2301?

2014-09-17 Thread Gilles Khouzam
Hi Rich, This looks good. Thanks. Gilles Khouzam Senior Development Lead Microsoft OSG From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Salz, Rich Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 12:05 To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Windows folks -- comment

RE: Windows folks -- comment on this patch for RT 2301?

2014-09-17 Thread Salz, Rich
:37 PM To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: RE: Windows folks -- comment on this patch for RT 2301? Hi Rich, This looks good. Thanks. Gilles Khouzam Senior Development Lead Microsoft OSG From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.orgmailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org

Windows folks -- comment on this patch for RT 2301?

2014-09-14 Thread Salz, Rich
Any input from Windows folks on the attached? -- Principal Security Engineer, Akamai Technologies IM: rs...@jabber.memailto:rs...@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz rt2301.patch Description: rt2301.patch