On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 08:46:01AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+On some SCO installations or versions, bc has a bug that gets triggered
+when you run the test suite (using "make test"). The message returned is
+"bc: 1 not implemented". You may run into something similar on FreeBSD
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 03:09:16AM +, Dr S N Henson wrote:
When mentioning features that don't exist in current releases of
OpenSSL (such as the new undocumented '-prexit' option to s_client),
the FAQ should point out that they don't: The FAQ is not just part
of the release, it's
Bodo Moeller wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 03:09:16AM +, Dr S N Henson wrote:
When mentioning features that don't exist in current releases of
OpenSSL (such as the new undocumented '-prexit' option to s_client),
the FAQ should point out that they don't: The FAQ is not just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bodo17-Dec-2000 01:32:51
Modified:.FAQ
Log:
When mentioning features that don't exist in current releases of
OpenSSL (such as the new undocumented '-prexit' option to s_client),
the FAQ should point out that they don't: The FAQ is
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
From the GNUTLS site:
"You should view this as an alternative implementation of OpenSSL
(actually GNUTLS is closer to Eric Young's SSLEAY rather than
OpenSSL)."
What does this mean?
A great news for everyone for writes GPL code that needs crypto.
When the FSF
Jim Russell wrote:
On or about Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:19:32PM -0500, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Notice that even after 20 years of RMS placing Kermit on the list of
things that must be done in a GPL manner he has never done so. I
doubt someone else is ever going to open source a competitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ulf 01-Dec-2000 03:47:52
Modified:.FAQ
Log:
GPL FAQ.
I hope this adequately summarizes the results of all those disussions.
Revision ChangesPath
1.37 +19 -0 openssl/FAQ
Index: FAQ
You can configure OpenSSL so as not to use RC5 and IDEA by using
./config no-rc5 no-idea
+
+
+* Can I use OpenSSL with GPL software?
+
+On many systems including the major Linux and BSD distributions, yes (the
+GPL does not place restrictions on using libraries
On or about Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:19:32PM -0500, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Notice that even after 20 years of RMS placing Kermit on the list of
things that must be done in a GPL manner he has never done so. I
doubt someone else is ever going to open source a competitor for
OpenSSL. There is
Don't construe this message as in any way taking sides in the "debate that never
ends". Just a quick point of fact, that there is, indeed, an GPL, open-source
"competitor" to OpenSSL under development, called GNUTLS. The URL is
http://gnutls.hellug.gr/
(Disclaimers repeated -
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
From the GNUTLS site:
"You should view this as an alternative implementation of OpenSSL
(actually GNUTLS is closer to Eric Young's SSLEAY rather than
OpenSSL)."
What does this mean?
Probably that its full of bugs.
:-)
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson.
Hmm. OpenSSL has served us well for years it seems to me
-- ever since eay dropped out to become RSA Australia :-)
Adding the GPL religion/meme/virus to SSL/TLS gives me
serious heartburn...
--
Ed Kubaitis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
CCSO - University of Illinois at
12 matches
Mail list logo
