RE: openssl + Microsoft's SSPI = Legal U.S.A. commercial use?

1999-12-20 Thread Salz, Rich
Also there is a crypto api that I believe gets you the RSA public-key functions. The CryptoAPI does not export enough functionality to enable you to implement SSL. This *might* have changed in Win2K. I haven't been following the discussions that closely; here are two messages on the subject:

openssl + Microsoft's SSPI = Legal U.S.A. commercial use?

1999-12-20 Thread Brian Poe
Beginning sp4 on NT 4, there is enough there, as there is a product already using it that costs 1k; http://www.dart.com ... see the "secure tool". It works, but it is only offered as an activex component. -Brian Also there is a crypto api that I believe gets you the RSA public-key functions.

Re: openssl + Microsoft's SSPI = Legal U.S.A. commercial use?

1999-12-20 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Beginning sp4 on NT 4, there is enough there, as there is a product already using it that costs 1k; http://www.dart.com ... see the "secure tool". It works, but it is only offered as an activex component. Its not clear what this tool is though. It appears to be simply the ability to

Re[2]: openssl + Microsoft's SSPI = Legal U.S.A. commercial use?

1999-12-20 Thread Brian Poe
I know that enough is there to avoid the legal issues in implementing it yourself. Indeed you need no RSA license to use the Dartcom product. -Brian Beginning sp4 on NT 4, there is enough there, as there is a product already using it that costs 1k; http://www.dart.com ... see the "secure