William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If you want to submit and have considered by the httpd project,
perhaps you
ment to submit it there?
Not yet. Since the corresponding openssl code is still in the
development branch,
and not in a stable one.
The apache2 patch was done to see whether the api is good
If you want to submit and have considered by the httpd project, perhaps you
ment to submit it there?
Nice work b.t.w.
Bill
Peter Sylvester wrote:
Hello,
I just have put together the small patch for apache 2.2.0 which allows
to use the sernername extension
logic in the development snapshot i
måndagen den 6 februari 2006 19.36 skrev Peter Sylvester:
> The version of this patch is not one hour old.
>
> The development snapshot is related to openssl
> which is also only there since a few weeks.
>
> The patch was done to validate that the openssl servername extension code
> can be easily u
The version of this patch is not one hour old.
The development snapshot is related to openssl
which is also only there since a few weeks.
The patch was done to validate that the openssl servername extension code
can be easily used in an application.
Both development teams may have opinions abo
måndagen den 6 februari 2006 18.13 skrev Peter Sylvester:
> Hello,
>
> I just have put together the small patch for apache 2.2.0 which allows
> to use the sernername extension
> logic in the development snapshot in order to select a different ssl
> context, and also to
> renegotiate if the vhost in
Hello,
I just have put together the small patch for apache 2.2.0 which allows
to use the sernername extension
logic in the development snapshot in order to select a different ssl
context, and also to
renegotiate if the vhost indicated by Host: has a different SSL_ctx
(e.g. certificate).
The
