At 01:01 23.04.99 +0200, you wrote:
>>Any comments / additions ?
>
>The question is what to do about name conflicts with applications.
>For example an application might also definite "bool".
Drop it ?
Since it is only defined on sun/sparc it seems to be a bad idea
to define it at all...
By
Goe
>Any comments / additions ?
The question is what to do about name conflicts with applications.
For example an application might also definite "bool".
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Devel
At 00:26 22.04.99 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi,
Hallo,
>I like the idea, can you include a Win32 platform
>in the head file.
Whatever we do, we should decide to do it quickly.
There seem to be hiding a lot of size dependencies in the code...
The file has some disadvantages:
1. There are no processor
Hi,
I like the idea, can you include a Win32 platform
in the head file.
Zhigang
--- Chris Jalbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/21/1999 1:49 AM, Goetz Babin-Ebell enlightened
> me with the following:
>
> >Perhaps we should clear sizes of data types.
> >
> >Perhaps something like:
> >
> >
On 4/21/1999 1:49 AM, Goetz Babin-Ebell enlightened me with the following:
>Perhaps we should clear sizes of data types.
>
>Perhaps something like:
>
>typedef char int8;
>typedef unsigned char uint8;
>typedef short int16;
>typedef unsigned short uint16;
>typede
