In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:41:03 +0900 (JST), GOTOU
Yuuzou [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
gotoyuzo In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
gotoyuzo `Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]' wrote:
gotoyuzo In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:38:27 +0900
(JST),
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
`GOTOU Yuuzou [EMAIL PROTECTED]' wrote:
This error could be avoided if we read at least one standard
header file before setting _XOPEN_SOURCE macro.
-#include stdio.h
#include openssl/opensslconf.h
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 500 /* glibc2 needs this to declare
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 05:37:15 +0900 (JST), GOTOU
Yuuzou [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
gotoyuzo Hi,
gotoyuzo
gotoyuzo Compilation of ssl/kssl.c fails on NetBSD 3.99.5.
gotoyuzo
gotoyuzo gcc -I../crypto -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -pthread
-D_THREAD_SAFE
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
`Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]' wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 05:37:15 +0900 (JST),
GOTOU Yuuzou [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
gotoyuzo Hi,
gotoyuzo
gotoyuzo Compilation of ssl/kssl.c fails on NetBSD 3.99.5.
gotoyuzo
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:38:27 +0900 (JST), GOTOU
Yuuzou [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
gotoyuzo It may be an issue of NetBSD, but #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE
gotoyuzo seems a little wrong too.
Does it work if I remove the #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE? I had it there for
paranoid reasons,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
`Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]' wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:38:27 +0900 (JST),
GOTOU Yuuzou [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
gotoyuzo It may be an issue of NetBSD, but #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE
gotoyuzo seems a little wrong
