Re: v0.9.8 cosmetic fixes for portability (QNX4 and Watcom C v10.6B)

2005-07-17 Thread dean gaudet
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > Incorrect. The compiler will see 'if(dv) ; if(rem) ; return(ret)'. > That's perfectly OK. oops :) -dean __ OpenSSL Project http://www.o

Re: v0.9.8 cosmetic fixes for portability (QNX4 and Watcom C v10.6B)

2005-07-17 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 17 Jul 2005 20:01:24 -0700 (PDT), dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: dean> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dean> dean> > Unless I do the following I get the "Meaningless use of exression" dean> > from the compiler: dean> > dean> > diff -ru

Re: v0.9.8 cosmetic fixes for portability (QNX4 and Watcom C v10.6B)

2005-07-17 Thread dean gaudet
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Unless I do the following I get the "Meaningless use of exression" > from the compiler: > > diff -ru openssl-0.9.8/crypto/bn/bn_recp.c > openssl-0.9.8-QNX/crypto/bn/bn_recp.c > --- openssl-0.9.8/crypto/bn/bn_recp.c 2005-04-26 22:53:13.0 +

v0.9.8 cosmetic fixes for portability (QNX4 and Watcom C v10.6B)

2005-07-17 Thread rz1a
Hello openssl-dev, Unless I do the following I get the "Meaningless use of exression" from the compiler: diff -ru openssl-0.9.8/crypto/bn/bn_recp.c openssl-0.9.8-QNX/crypto/bn/bn_recp.c --- openssl-0.9.8/crypto/bn/bn_recp.c 2005-04-26 22:53:13.0 +0400 +++ openssl-0.9.8-QNX4/crypto/bn/bn