Request verification differs between platforms???

2001-11-02 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
I just gor a CSR (included below) that fails verification on Linux but where verification succeeds on VMS. In both cases, OpenSSL 0.9.6b is used: openssl req -in DaveJones.csr -noout -verify gives "verify failure" on my Linux laptop, and "verify OK" on my VAX. So I'm confused, is that CSR corre

Of course I forgot to include the CSR itself...

2001-11-02 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
-BEGIN CERTIFICATE REQUEST- MIIC/TCCAeUCAQAwgZwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQ0wCwYDVQQIEwRPaGlvMREwDwYD VQQHEwhDb2x1bWJ1czEeMBwGA1UEChMVT2hpbyBTdGF0ZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5MRQw EgYDVQQLEwtFbmdpbmVlcmluZzEXMBUGA1UEAxMORGF2aWQgTC4gSm9uZXMxHDAa BgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWDXZtYW4rQG9zdS5lZHUwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IB Dw

Re: Request verification differs between platforms???

2001-11-02 Thread Bernard Leach
That CSR fails verification using a java based crypto library. Strange that it verifies on VMS - was it generated there per chance? regards, bernard. Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > > I just gor a CSR (included below) that fails verification on Linux but > where verification succeeds o

Re: Request verification differs between platforms???

2001-11-02 Thread Ben Laurie
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > > I just gor a CSR (included below) that fails verification on Linux but > where verification succeeds on VMS. In both cases, OpenSSL 0.9.6b is > used: > > openssl req -in DaveJones.csr -noout -verify > > gives "verify failure" on my Linux laptop, and "ve

e_os.h allways defines _REENTRANT on sun ?

2001-11-02 Thread Götz Babin-Ebell
from e_os.h: #if defined(THREADS) || defined(sun) ^^^ #ifndef _REENTRANT #define _REENTRANT #endif #endif why ? and why is it exported ? Bye Goetz -- Goetz Babin-Ebell, TC TrustCenter AG, http://www.trustcenter.de Sonninstr. 24-28, 20097 Hamburg, Germany Tel.

Bad Emails

2001-11-02 Thread Steven A. Bade
You may have gotten a bunch of old emails from me. Pls ignore these as I have had a emailer problem which decided to send the contents of my outbox folder. Consider all other email from me today as invalid... I will. -- Steven A. Bade UNIX Network Security Cryptographic Strategy and Developmen

Questions regarding 64-bit-safeness of code OpenSSL

2001-11-02 Thread Romberg, Kathy
Folks, I am in the process building OpenSSL (0.9.6b) on the Tru64 Unix (Compaq/Digital Unix) platform and have a few questions for you regarding the 64-bit safeness of the product. There are two options that I use on the Compaq C compiler when checking the code for potential problems. The first

RE: Questions regarding 64-bit-safeness of code OpenSSL

2001-11-02 Thread Brajesh Tiwari
Romberg: Can you please send me the modified files. Thank you. Brajesh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Romberg, Kathy Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:02 AM To: Openssl-Dev (E-mail) Subject: Questions regarding 64-bit-safeness of code O

Re: AW: PKCS#11 support ?

2001-11-02 Thread Douglas E. Engert
"Steven A. Bade" wrote: > > I believe recently 2 individuals posted something about having > implemented PKCS#11 support for some level of tokens. We have had PKCS#11 support with SSLeay and OpenSSL since 1998. as part of the Globus Project(tm) http://www.globus.org The RSA structure was ext