Thanks for the correction, it's now applied and committed.
This ticket is now resolved.
[guest - Tue Jan 21 10:50:11 2003]:
> The commit for PR: 462 broke build on FreeBSD 4.2, looks like a
> missing
> zero or in the #if conditional.
--
Richard Levitte
___
- Original Message -
From: "Dr. Stephen Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:03 AM
Subject: Re: Problem with signing X509 certificate.
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>
> > Hallo all
> >
> > I have a little problem atm where I ha
The issue was addressed in RT#464, SCO clean-up, and this ticket is
therefore being resolved. You can either fetch latest 0.9.7-stable
snapsot at ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot/ or manually edit ./Configure
and remove -lresolv from sco5-cc line. A.
_
The originally reported issue is addressed and the ticket is being
resolved. Temporary workaround for emerged issue with aix64-cc shared
build is documented in PROBLEMS. A.
__
OpenSSL Project http:/
Jaco Kroon wrote:
I don't think this is it. I managed to set up a certificate with excactly
the same parameters using the openssl utitility, including a serial number
of 0. It verified ok. Could it be that I'm not setting it explicitly? Say
I have a string containing a hex number, how wou
I have compiled and installed it through removing -lrevolv,anyways thanks
a lot.
>From: "Andy Polyakov via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [openssl.org #460] Ticket Resolved
>Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:34:56 +0100 (MET)
>
>According to o
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:59:31 +0100, Nils Larsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
--- SNIP ---
>
> Is it possible to show us both certificates ? Which version of OpenSSL
> are you using ? OS ?
k, first all the os and version info, currently using Debian Linux 3.0 (aka
woody - is up to date with all
Jaco Kroon wrote:
I believe that is it, waiting for your reply. I'll try a version upgrade
on OpenSSL and let you know anyhow - but somehow I don't think it's going
to help :).
Hi Jaco,
here is the 'openssl asn1parse ...' output of the certificate
created by your program:
0:d=0 hl=
> here is the 'openssl asn1parse ...' output of the certificate
> created by your program:
>
> 0:d=0 hl=4 l= 598 cons: SEQUENCE
> 4:d=1 hl=4 l= 447 cons: SEQUENCE
> 8:d=2 hl=2 l= 3 cons: cont [ 0 ]
> 10:d=3 hl=2 l= 1 prim:INTEGER :00
> 13:d=2 hl=2 l
Stephen,
Thanks for the reply. We were kind of hit over the head with this, as it
had been working fine for quite a while with no problems and suddenly blew
up on us.
Both the openssl application and the 2 dll's are the official 0.9.7 release.
I searched the machine and these are the only versi
Hello,
I send that message to the openssl-dev list because the same problem
is likely to have occurred or to occur in a near future to openssl
developpers.
I am currently developping an implementation of the certification path
validation algorithm described in section 6.1 of RFC 3280. I need
some
Dear Thomas,
The consortium that I am currently in have some test suites for policy
mapping, or more specifically cross certification situation. But I am
not sure how much our test suites are suitable for your needs.
Now we evaluate the test suites using several implementations. There
will be pu
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jan 23 15:33:56 2003]:
> Stephen,
>
> Thanks for the reply. We were kind of hit over the head with this, as
> it
> had been working fine for quite a while with no problems and suddenly
> blew
> up on us.
>
> Both the openssl application and the 2 dll's are the official
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:16:31 +0100,
Thomas Pornin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pornin> 2. I heard the NIST is preparing an advanced test suite which
pornin>might be of some help; is there any info about when this
pornin>test suite will be ready ?
I believe tha
Sorry, SP5 not SP6.
I figured it had to do with a time value overflowing a variable size. I'll
crank down the days value temporarily to workaround it.
Thanks for the help. Felt silly sending off the report instead of just
digging in and fixing it, but staying ahead of layoffs here has kept me
Maybe openssl-bugs is the right forum? This really isn't a bug, but a
performance improvement.
-david
-Forwarded Message-
From: David Brumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: patch to 0.9.7 -performacne
Date: 23 Jan 2003 11:53:09 -0800
Hi,
I wrote awhile back about a
I can't get it. So lets drop and and try again later
Joseph A Amaturo
President
Amatech Solutions, Inc.
AT Concepts, Inc.
(P) 845-988-9876
(C) 845-590-7914
(F) 845-988-9899
www.amatechsolutions.com
Microsoft Certified Partner
-Original Message-
From: Lutz Jaenicke via RT [mailto:[EMAIL
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Jan 19 08:28:56 2003]:
>
> >Did you build a debug version of OpenSSL to link against for the
> debug
> >build? This isn't handled automatically and you need to change it so
> it
> >picks up and uses the debug libraries.
>
> Nope. that would explain it. criss-crossing
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003, Thomas Pornin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 3. If there is no reference test suite available, should it be assumed
> that there exists no tested, and, therefore with high probability no
> correct, implementation of the certification path validation algorithm
> which handles the policy
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jan 23 20:34:01 2003]:
> Sorry, SP5 not SP6.
>
> I figured it had to do with a time value overflowing a variable size.
> I'll
> crank down the days value temporarily to workaround it.
>
I've committed a fix now.
20 matches
Mail list logo
