appro appro 1. I'm reluctant to include bn.h to non-bn code, because it's
appro appronothing but counterintuitive [and is not good in long run].
appro appro 2. My standpoint is [still] that pqueue/dtls1 should not have
appro approdependancy on bh.h either.
appro appro 3. Using BIGNUM
Hi!
I wanted to crete a self signed certificate with a long lifetime.
Problem: the -days parameter does not accept appropriate values. There is an
overflow at 11913 days, 11912 days are ok.
example:
openssl req -new -x509 -key mykey.pem -out mycert.cer -sha1 -days 11913
Version: 0.9.7g
Hello,
I apologize if this message appears multiple times.
This is a proposed patch for openssl-0.9.8-beta for all platforms.
I tested it with openssl-0.9.8beta2 however I think it is applicable to
all openssl-0.9.8 trees.
I think the current implementation of DTLS is not compliant with
should be fixed. please test a new snapshot.
Thanks,
Nils
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
should be fixed; please try a new snapshot.
Thanks,
Nils
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Apologies for the delayed joining of the discussion.
I chose to use BN to implement 64-bit numbers because (1) it was
little code, (2) the abstraction was clean, (3) BN works on all
supported platforms, (4) the places where emulated 64-bit numbers are
used are not performance critical, and
I think you might have found a bug in the draft document. I'll get back
to you soon. Thanks,
nagendra
* Tigran Gevorgyan via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-08 22:00:58 +0200]:
Hello,
I apologize if this message appears multiple times.
This is a proposed patch for openssl-0.9.8-beta
