Re: [openssl-dev] STORE (was: [RFC 0/2] Proposal for seamless handling of TPM based RSA keys in openssl)

On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 14:04 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: > It does now for everything but PKCS#12 files.  Those are trickier, and > I'm working on it. Nice. > Speaking of...  do you mind if I pilfer from that Makefile.am for our > tests? Not at all; please do. You're welcome to use anything in

Re: [openssl-dev] [RFC v2 2/2] pem: load engine keys

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 09:30 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: > > James Bottomley skrev: (1 > december 2016 07:36:26 CET) > > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 01:38 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: > > > > > > James Bottomley skrev:

Re: [openssl-dev] [RFC v2 0/2] Proposal for seamless handling of TPM based RSA keys in openssl

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:49 +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 13:59 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > The point here is that because there's a pem file > > > representation of the > > > > key, it can be used anywhere a PEM file can be *without* > > >

[openssl-dev] STORE (was: [RFC 0/2] Proposal for seamless handling of TPM based RSA keys in openssl)

In message <1479823032.8937.37.ca...@infradead.org> on Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:57:12 +, David Woodhouse said: dwmw2> On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 14:18 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: dwmw2> > dwmw2> > Just let me shamelessly mention my STORE effort again ;-) dwmw2> > Among others,