Re: Latest version and Win32?

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Someone on modssl-users mentioned: 6. openssl-snap-19990523-1530 has build error "NMAKE: fatal error U1073: don't know how to make '.\crypto\date.h' Can someone of our Win32 experts check this and try to fix it

Re: no-shared cipher

Gang Lu wrote: Hi, I tried to build a client and a server based on the example of cli.cpp and serv.cpp in openssl-0.9.2b. However, I always get the following erro message: 19296:error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:no shared cipher:S3_srvr.c:759 Could anyone give me a

req_attributes

Hi, can an expert give me some ideas what is mean of a req_attributes? Do I have to provide these when generate a req? [ req_attributes ] challengePassword = A challenge password challengePassword_min = 4 challengePassword_max = 20 unstructuredName

Re: req_attributes

Wu Zhigang wrote: Hi, can an expert give me some ideas what is mean of a req_attributes? Do I have to provide these when generate a req? [ req_attributes ] challengePassword = A challenge password challengePassword_min = 4 challengePassword_max = 20

Re: req_attributes

Wu Zhigang wrote: Hi, can an expert give me some ideas what is mean of a req_attributes? Do I have to provide these when generate a req? [ req_attributes ] challengePassword = A challenge password challengePassword_min = 4 challengePassword_max = 20

Re: 0.9.3 bug ?

Al Smith wrote: on linux 2.2[.9] with egcs-1.1.2 and libc.5.4.46, the bignum test fails. with "./Configure no-asm linux-elf", test/bntest results in the attached output, which ends with "Left shift test failed!" the next test (exptest) appears to be caught in a loop and doesn't actually

Re: 0.9.3 bug ?

on linux 2.2[.9] with egcs-1.1.2 and libc.5.4.46, the bignum test fails. with "./Configure no-asm linux-elf", test/bntest results in the attached output, which ends with "Left shift test failed!" the next test (exptest) appears to be caught in a loop and doesn't actually produce any output at

Re: 0.9.3 bug ?

Andy Polyakov wrote: on linux 2.2[.9] with egcs-1.1.2 and libc.5.4.46, the bignum test fails. with "./Configure no-asm linux-elf", test/bntest results in the attached output, which ends with "Left shift test failed!" the next test (exptest) appears to be caught in a loop and doesn't

Re: 0.9.3 bug ?

could you apply this patch and try again? sure: 82E8FF318CBABE4C37B8DD0B737D813D7F31F0A2061BBE34D10 * 2 - 105D1FE6319757C986F71BA16E6FB027AFE63E1440C377C69A20 105D1FE6319757C986F71BA16E6FB027AFE63E1440C377C69A20 * 2 -

Building 0.9.3 on NT with ml...

I have some problems building openssl-0.9.3 on NT with ml enabled (i.e. no-asm removed from do_ms.bat). I get the following when building: 1. perl Configure VC-WIN32 -- OK 2. ms\do_ms -- OK 3. nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak -- ... cl /Fotmp32dll\c_zlib.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32dll /MD /W3 /WX /G5 /Ox

RE: Building 0.9.3 on NT with ml...

**Blush** It was as simple as running the perl script in the asm directory. perl md5-586.pl win32 md5-win32.asm Still, another small fix for 0.9.3a... /Per -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrik Carlsson Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 1999

OpenSSL 0.9.3 build problem on BSDI/i386

In case anyone else has this problem, here's some help. I had a problem building openssl-0.9.3 on the following machine config: uname -m = i386 uname -s = BSD/OS uname -r = 3.1 The compile bombed in crypto/sha/sha_dgst.c because the target machine (i386) doesn't support

Re: Building 0.9.3 on NT with ml...

...or running the x86asm.sh which updates everything! No problems after that. Thanks! Patrik Per Nilsson wrote: **Blush** It was as simple as running the perl script in the asm directory. perl md5-586.pl win32 md5-win32.asm Still, another small fix for 0.9.3a... /Per -Original