Request (and private key) is in newreq.pem
Using configuration from ../apps/openssl.cnf
error on line 6 of config file '../apps/openssl.cnf'
19227:error:0E065068:configuation file routines:STR_COPY:variable has no
value:conf.c578:line 6
Have you changed the contents of openssl.cnf?
Just
As such, I would like to isolate all of the
extraneous Unix include files and IO. I
would also like to pare down as much of the
code as possible to shrink the object size.
Look in the mail archives (use www.openssl.org for directions) for a
thread about "Small Footprint" a couple of weeks
Hi there;
I am using the openssl on Solaris, the code looks something like this :
int err = SSL_accept(ssl);
if(err 0)
return 0;//success
if(!BIO_sock_should_retry(err))
{
/*ERROR*/
}
this code works fine for a period of time, but after a while, it always goes
to the /*ERROR*/ line,
Nancy Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Using configuration from ../apps/openssl.cnf
error on line 6 of config file '../apps/openssl.cnf'
19227:error:0E065068:configuation file routines:STR_COPY:variable has no
value:conf.c578:line 6
cat: Cannot open newcert.pem: No such file or
Hi -- I'm not sure which list to send it to, or if this has
been addressed, but I searched the openssl-user and openssl-dev
archives with no luck.
I just noticed that using des_random_key does not usually
produce a valid key, since after the final
I forgot to mention, I'm runing OpenSSL 0.9.3a. Thanks again.
-Jef
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing
Hi,
I found there are two ways to encrypt/decrypt RECORD
data after a SSL connection is set up in OpenSSL.
1.In the ssl3_enc() function, it calls EVP_Cipher() to
encrypt/decrypt the record data;
2.In the do_ssl3_write() function, it calls do_compress()
to compress the record data, then
I suppose I ought to start thinking about submitting diffs back to the
project, huh?
Yes, please do so via openssl-dev list. But please
consider the following: (a) code needs to be somehow
stable since probably no other developer has a Mac
and can test it (b) the original code should be left
Ulf Moeller wrote:
Was I assuming too much when I assumed that OpenSSL would be a useful
framework for implementing cryptosystems not currently used by SSL or
TLS?
It depends on what you want to do. I have found OpenSSL a very useful
basis for my OpenPGP implementation. Implementing
I am using ecgs 1.1.2 to build openssl on Windows NT.
ms\mw.bat
It passed a lot of gcc then
del out/libcrypto.a
Invalid switch - "libcrypto.a".
make: *** [out/libcrypto.a] Error 1
It seems that del would like to see out\libcrypto.a (Gates's way) instead of
out/libcrypto.a (Unix
Dmitry Solodovnick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I tried to test my sever application (based on OpenSSL-0.9.3a library)
on Windows NT (it worked correctly on Solaris 2.7 and Linux RH without
memory leaks etc.).
But on NT I got an error after 2- 4 hours working in hard mode ( after
~~ 1500 HTTP
I was developing an SSL client (with openssl-0.9.3a)
and found memory leaks when using RC4-MD5 (1024/128 bits).
HOWEVER, when I switched to "EXP-RC4-MD5" (512/40 bits),
there are NO leaks.
The best way to reproduce the leaks is to run 's_time'
for a long time. (Use 'top' to monitor its memory
gic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was developing an SSL client (with openssl-0.9.3a)
and found memory leaks when using RC4-MD5 (1024/128 bits).
HOWEVER, when I switched to "EXP-RC4-MD5" (512/40 bits),
there are NO leaks.
The best way to reproduce the leaks is to run 's_time'
for a long time. (Use
13 matches
Mail list logo
