Hi Guys,
from cvs the overnight changes have caused a make test failure see
below...
Operating system: i686-whatever-linux2
Configuring for linux-elf
machine is pentium-2 // running a heavily modified version of redhat 5.2
linux
i did a make clean before the cvs update...
anything else I've
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:15:10AM +, Sean O'Riordain wrote:
from cvs the overnight changes have caused a make test failure see
below...
The test passes with the bn_mul.c from the stable branch. The version on
the dev branch is broken (also with the C version of bn_sub_part_words).
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at
__ $Date: 2000/11/19 14:11:03 $
DEVELOPMENT STATE
o OpenSSL 0.9.7: Under development...
o OpenSSL 0.9.6: Released on September 24th, 2000
o OpenSSL 0.9.5a: Released on April
From: "Sean O'Riordain" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
seanpor Hi Guys,
seanpor from cvs the overnight changes have caused a make test failure see
seanpor below...
Interesting! BN_mul() could be one problem, although it was some time
ago I made the last change to it...
I'll check it out as soon as I can.
autoconf/automake does not work on Windows
I strongly agree with Geoff that the maintainers will probably find it easier
to maintain three "native" build environments -- Win32, VMS, Posix-like --
than the current scheme where things are shoe-horned into a really messy
like-no-other build
hii friends,
well can anybody tell me what is the major implementation differences between the SSL
v3 specs and that implemented by Openssl. in what way they differ, what shortcomings
have open ssl addressed to, and where is it weaker than original SSL developed by
Netscape..
i need a Thesis
