-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I would have thought that this would be a FAQ.
It is not. What is the "engine"?
I was however, specifically trying to determine if anyone
has started any work on having an AES integrated into openssl.
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org
The "make test" in 0.9.7 needs a little work.
It requires a previous SSL installation.
...
Tests completed happily
./evp_test evptests.txt
Auto configuration failed
3562:error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or
directory:bss_file.c:104:fopen('/usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf','rb')
3562:err
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
levitte> 3) In the snapshot directory, the 0.9.7-dev snapshots are now called
levitte>openssl-0.9.6-stable-SNAP-{MMDD}.tar.gz, where {MMDD} is
levitte>replaced with the datestamp of the snapshot.
That was supposed to say ope
Dr S N Henson wrote:
>
> Markus Friedl wrote:
> >
> > I think this change is needed if you want EVP_CipherInit() to have a
> > similar semantic as in OpenSSL 0.9.6.
> >
> > Index: evp/evp_enc.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/openssl/cryp
Hi
I am trying to install openssl-0.9.6b on Sun Solaris 8.
After successfully running the config, I am getting error when I run make
I am attaching the output of make and make report.
Waiting eagerly for your response
Thanking in advance
Regards
Rakesh
makereport.out
Description: Binary
Markus Friedl wrote:
>
> I think this change is needed if you want EVP_CipherInit() to have a
> similar semantic as in OpenSSL 0.9.6.
>
> Index: evp/evp_enc.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/openssl/crypto/evp/evp_enc.c,v
> retrieving revisi
Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>
> Can someone help me implement the EVP macros for AES 128-bit CFB and
> OFB modes? It's too messy for me to figure out.
>
> I've got non-EVP versions written, but it appears the EVP macros do
> their own implementation of the various modes and only call the base
> ECB f
Has anyone been sucessfull using Pentium Pro compiler optimizations
on UnixWare or OpenUNIX ? It builds but the md2test fails.
All works fine without the -Kpentium_pro (-Kp6 on UW 2.1.x) flag.
I see this problem on UnixWare 2.1.3 and OpenUNIX 8.0.0
My UnixWare 7.1.1 box runs a pentium so I can't
Thus spake Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker:
>
> Note that this puts a requirement on the algorithm functions to follow
> a certain name standard. The expected frunctions are, for a certain
> {prefix} (AES in the AES case, I assume :-)):
>
>{prefix}_ecb_encrypt
>{prefix}_cbc_encryp
Markus Friedl wrote:
>
>
> There could be more problems with other XXX_Init() or similar
> functions, so all semantic changes to functions from the 0.9.6 API
> should be reconsidered. All such changes could be a threat to existing
> applications and break them in subtle ways -- and this must be
Hi,
I have a patch to allow openssl to be built for a VxWorks
target.
Specifically a PowerPC 405 target, but changing targets should
be
a matter of adding a line in the Configure file.
I am primarily concerned with the libcrypt functionality and
have not
p
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> In TLS, the "IV for subsequent records is the last ciphertext block
> from the previous record" [RFC 2246], and plaintext blocks usually
> consist of raw application data followed by a MAC, so the attack
> applies. (Having the MAC at the *beginning* of
I think this change is needed if you want EVP_CipherInit() to have a
similar semantic as in OpenSSL 0.9.6.
Index: evp/evp_enc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/openssl/crypto/evp/evp_enc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -r1.28 evp_enc.c
--- e
The OpenSSL 0.9.7 release cycle has started.
Be at ease, we're still a bit away from making betas, there are a
couple of rather serious bugs to fix. However, this means that a few
changes have been made:
1) In the CVS repository, there's now a branch tagged with the name
OpenSSL_0_9_7-stable
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 02:54:46PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> From: Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> vinschen> case $RELEASE in
> vinschen> [bB]*|1.0|1.[12].*)
> vinschen> options="$options no-threads no-asm no-shared" ;;
> vinschen> esac
> vinschen>
> vinsch
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Hugo Krawczyk wrote:
[...]
> Thus, future revisions of TLS should also take this into account.
> That is, either transmit a fresh (unpredictable) IV with each msg,
> or implcitly compute this IV in an *unpredictable* way, for example by
> applying a prf
From: Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
vinschen> case $RELEASE in
vinschen> [bB]*|1.0|1.[12].*)
vinschen> options="$options no-threads no-asm no-shared" ;;
vinschen> esac
vinschen>
vinschen> This switches back to the old behaviour in case of the old
vinschen> B15-B20 versions and a
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:47:23AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> One question remains before I go ahead: is it possible to have config
> check the version of Cygwin and decide for another configuration
> target if it's too old to provide thread safety. Since people with
> older Cy
From: Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
vinschen> is this patch still in the loop?
Thanks for the reminder! I had never put it in my patch queue while I
was considering your answers to my questions, and then other things
got heaped on me.
I've now reched the patch and really put it my queue
From: Stephen Sprunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
stephen> Can someone help me implement the EVP macros for AES 128-bit CFB and
stephen> OFB modes? It's too messy for me to figure out.
stephen>
stephen> I've got non-EVP versions written, but it appears the EVP macros do
stephen> their own implementation
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 04:48:58PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> > From: Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > vinschen> I don't want to be pushy but I'd like to know if I have to do
> > vinschen> something
Since you're in the USA (or at least w7optics.com is), you have to
resend that patch with a cc: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see www.crypto.com
for explanations), or otherwise we can't accept it.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +4
22 matches
Mail list logo
