Hi,
While creating the Self Signed certificate I got the following error:
0x2006E079. And test got failed. Could you please guide me on how to look at
these error messages? And how to proceed further?
For Certificate Request , got the following error : 0x2206506f.
Please clarify the same.
Apparently not all of the CFLAGs which are generated by
perl Configure zlib --with-krb5-flavor=MIT VC-WIN32
are moved to the resulting ms\*.mak files. In particular,
-DZLIB -DKRB5_MIT -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DDSO_WIN32
are not moved although there could be more items. util/mk1mf.pl most
Hi,
I wrote the same mail to openssl-users too but nobody answers. So I
write again and attach the diffs.
I used openssl ca -subj
If I used serialNumber in the DN then OpenSSL reports the following:
The Subject's Distinguished Name is as follows
serialNumber :PRINTABLE:'02'
I am trying to port the DES routines to C#
.NET. Can someone tell me what the E0 and E1 values are in the LOAD_DATA
#define ?
No one is seriously going to use c#, particularly
porting from java.
see
http://news.com.com/2008-1082-817522.html?tag=rc_spec
Tim
--- Jeff Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you can create .NET components in Java too !
The point is that there are going to be a lot of
.NET
Steve:
Which flavor of Kerberos 5 are you using?
Which release?
I have a feeling the reasons that you are I are seeing different
warnings is because the types of the fields in different flavors or
versions are different.
I'm compiling against MIT 1.2.4 which is the current release.
Some of
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Steve:
Which flavor of Kerberos 5 are you using?
Which release?
I have a feeling the reasons that you are I are seeing different
warnings is because the types of the fields in different flavors or
versions are different.
I'm compiling against MIT 1.2.4 which
Date sent: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 9:35:06 EST
From: Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: cvs commit: openssl/ssl kssl.c
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In both 0.9.6c and 0.9.7-SNAP, the function ssl_verify_alarm_type in
ssl/s3_both.c seems to be missing the newest x509 verification error
codes, like X509_V_ERR_INVALID_PURPOSE, in the switch statment. If such
a verification error is encountered, the switch will fall through and an
unknown