On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:42:24AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:09:18PM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
Here is a revised patch for DOS (and other platforms that don't
support symbolic links). With this patch openssl-0.9.7 snapshot from
19 April 2002 compiles
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 09:43:28PM -0500, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
i got this patch backporting (sorta - for sure not as elegant as Lutz code
on 0.9.7 but i didn't wanted to make too many changes on the 0.9.6 code so
the patch looks clear) the prngd support that comes with openssl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
levitte 20-Apr-2002 12:22:43
Modified:crypto/engine tb_ecdsa.c
Log:
The callback must have (void) as argument list.
Notified by Bernd Matthes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Surely only in the prototype - its necessarily void in the actual
function if there
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 06:38:01PM +0700, Satria Bakti (13297096) wrote:
I'm working on openssl 0.9.6 (and SSL generally)
and trying to implement new cipher suite.
0.9.6 is finished, jump onto the 0.9.7 wagon.
The new cipher suite will be :
SSL_RSA_WITH_ABLOCKCIPHER_CBC_SHA
What files
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:42:12PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi,
I've attached a file which I'd like to get into the ssl source tree.
It's a script which automatically generates the binary runtime and
development tar archives as they are provided by the Cygwin net
distribution.
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at
__ $Date: 2002/04/13 22:47:04 $
DEVELOPMENT STATE
o OpenSSL 0.9.7: Under development...
o OpenSSL 0.9.6c: Released on December 21st, 2001
o OpenSSL 0.9.6b: Released on July
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:58:40 +0100, Ben
Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
benThe callback must have (void) as argument list.
benNotified by Bernd Matthes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ben
ben Surely only in the prototype - its necessarily void in the actual
ben function
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Oh and, btw., current Cygwin is 1.3.10, 1.3.11 coming soon. Why are
you testing with a version which is almost a year old?
It was just what was installed on my machine. I hadn't updated in a
while. Thanks for the reminder. I am now at 1.3.10.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:40:56AM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Oh and, btw., current Cygwin is 1.3.10, 1.3.11 coming soon. Why are
you testing with a version which is almost a year old?
It was just what was installed on my machine. I hadn't
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 21 Apr 2002
21:06:16 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Lutz.Jaenicke On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:40:56AM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
Lutz.Jaenicke It was just what was installed on my machine. I hadn't updated in a
Lutz.Jaenicke while. Thanks for
I tried installing openssl-0.9.6c and got the same errors as before. Cazn
anyone help? It would be much appreciated. A sample of the errors are
listed below.
Thanks,
Nir Goldman
making all in crypto/bn...
.
cc -I.. -I../../include -DNO_ASM -O -DAIX -DB_ENDIAN -c bn_div.c
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:40:56AM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Oh and, btw., current Cygwin is 1.3.10, 1.3.11 coming soon. Why are
you testing with a version which is almost a year old?
It was
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:22:23 -0700 (PDT), Nir Goldman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
nir I tried installing openssl-0.9.6c and got the same errors as before. Cazn
nir anyone help? It would be much appreciated. A sample of the errors are
nir listed below.
nir
nir
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Doug Kaufman wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:40:56AM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Oh and, btw., current Cygwin is 1.3.10, 1.3.11 coming soon. Why are
you testing with
14 matches
Mail list logo
