[PATCH] Supply missing prototypes for OpenSSL 0.9.6g

With the introduction of public key cryptography into the Network Time Protocol (NTP v4, cf. http://www.ntp.org/), the current version of NTP became a heavy user of OpenSSL. NTP developers strive to keep the sources warning-free with gcc (using -Wall -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-ari

Re: [openssl.org #221] for ARM

I get it, Think you very much. - Original Message - From: "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 5:20 PM Subject: [openssl.org #221] for ARM > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Aug 14 10:43:15 2002]: > >

[openssl.org #214] Regarding query on OPENSSL

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Aug 12 17:59:26 2002]: > This mail is regarding CERT-23 that was reported recently. > > As per the CERT, to fix the reported vulnerabilities, either we > should > upgrade to version Openssl09.6.e or apply the patch from version > Openssl0.9.6d. Yes. >

[openssl.org #202] Help

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Aug 8 09:43:45 2002]: > I'm trying to install open-ssh 34p1 on an Aix server, running 4.3.3.. > I compiled openssh 0.9.6d and zlib 1.1.4. on the server , and also >created > the a bff pancake using the contrib/aix/buildbff.sh script. > I can't start sshd either ins

[openssl.org #212] SSL_CTX_flush_sessions() must be called before SSL_CTX_free().

[jaenicke - Tue Aug 13 15:16:11 2002]: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:44:26PM +0200, Geoff Thorpe via RT wrote: > > I think it's unlikely, but I'd guess off the top of my head that > > something like the following would be less risky; > > > > if (a->sessions != NULL) > >

[openssl.org #200] wrong URL for rt in README for 0.9.7-beta3

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Aug 6 17:38:38 2002]: > > nexus@thune[4:34pm]src/openssl/openssl-0.9.7-beta3(539) grep rt2.html README > (http://www.openssl.org/rt2.html) by mail to: > > > should be org/support/rt2 Thanks, fixed. Lutz

RE: [openssl.org #223] Length error in EVP_DecodeBlock

How about adding a high-level function in 0.9.7 a la SHA1() and MD5(), for example EVP_Decode() and EVP_Encode()? I suspect that a majority if base 64 encodes/decodes are on a single chunk so the Init/Update/Final/defining EVP context mechanism is overkill at the app level. Chris Brook -Ori

Increasing the struct_ref member of engine_st

While some OpenSSL "objects" (DH, DSA, RSA) offer an *_up_ref function to increase the reference count, others have their internal structure publicly available (EVP_PKEY, X509, etc), so you can use CRYPTO_add() to increase the reference count. In the process of writing wrapper classes for vari

[openssl.org #228] Windows: ASN1 time routine can cause core dump (0.9.6g)

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Aug 16 13:44:38 2002]: > "Unchecked return from gmtime in ASN1 time set routine can cause core > dump on > Windows" [...] > Those hundred years in the -days argument seem to bee too much for > Windows. The > time value t in the > ASN1_UTCTIME *ASN1_UTCTIME_set(ASN

[openssl.org #228] Windows: ASN1 time routine can cause core dump (0.9.6g)

Hello all "Unchecked return from gmtime in ASN1 time set routine can cause core dump on Windows" I found this problem when debugging 'nmake test' for Net::SSLeay. openssl is called: openssl.exe req -config examples/req.conf -x509 -day

[openssl.org #220] bug in config (openssl-0.9.6g, Solaris2.6)

> Note that the solaris-sparcv9-cc and solaris-sparcv9-gcc configurations > actually use just sparcv8plus code (32 bit); see Configure. I did not know that, since I looked at config only, but not at Configure. But still: is it assured that every sun4u machine has the sparcv8plus instruction se

Re: cvs commit: openssl-web/support faq.wml

On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 09:34:10AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ulf 16-Aug-2002 09:34:09 > > Modified:support faq.wml > Log: > hm... > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.3 +1 -1 openssl-web/support/faq.wml > > Index: faq.wml >

[openssl.org #226] Compiling 0.9.7 with zlib [patch]

This ticket is resolved. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager

Re: [openssl.org #227] Building openssl 0.9.7 on sunos 4.1.3_U1

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:17:27 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: dkaufman> I recently tried to build the August 9th snapshot of openssl 0.9.7 on dkaufman> a sun sparc machine running sunos 4.1.3_U1. This failed in several dkaufman> areas. Here are

Re: [openssl.org #226] Compiling 0.9.7 with zlib [patch]

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:53:11 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: dkaufman> I recently tried to compile the August 9th snapshot of openssl 0.9.7 dkaufman> with static zlib enabled. The build failed because Configure only adds dkaufman> "-lz" for dyn

Re: [openssl.org #225] OpenSSL Security Advisory (30 July 2002), recompiling application s using OpenSSL, enhancement request

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 04:01:57PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have read your OpenSSL Security Advisory (30 July 2002), where there is > the recommendation to upgrade to OpenSSL 0.9.6e for those using 0.9.6d and > earlier. > > We are using OpenSSL version 0.9.6a-9 and OpenSSH version 2.9

[openssl.org #227] Building openssl 0.9.7 on sunos 4.1.3_U1

I recently tried to build the August 9th snapshot of openssl 0.9.7 on a sun sparc machine running sunos 4.1.3_U1. This failed in several areas. Here are the changes I made to allow it to compile, but I am not sure that these are the correct fixes. The main problems: this version of sunos doesn't

[openssl.org #226] Compiling 0.9.7 with zlib [patch]

I recently tried to compile the August 9th snapshot of openssl 0.9.7 with static zlib enabled. The build failed because Configure only adds "-lz" for dynamic zlib. I think that this patch fixes the problem. Doug --- openssl-0.9.7-beta3/Configure.orig Thu Aug 1 14:06:26