Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker writes:
> Have you looked at lhash.h, and the DECLARE_LHASH*/IMPLEMENT_LHASH*
> macros? That's how we have started to solve the type problems. Yes,
> the generated functions contain some internal casting, but in such a
> way that they don't affect the code that use
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 15
>Aug 2002 19:17:27 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> dkaufman> I recently tried to build the August 9th snapshot of openssl 0.9.7 on
> dkaufman> a sun sparc machin
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 15
>Aug 2002 19:17:27 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> dkaufman> I recently tried to build the August 9th snapshot of openssl 0.9.7 on
> dkaufman> a sun sparc machine
Leif Kremkow wrote:
> I'm looking for some guidance. I'd like to change the OpenSSL library to be
> able to use a TRNG for all random numbers, not just to seed the PRNG.
There are no such devices which produce adequate quantities of random
material for a server with reasonable load. Most have a
Hi,
I'm looking for some guidance. I'd like to change the OpenSSL library to be
able to use a TRNG for all random numbers, not just to seed the PRNG.
Are the some docs available as to where I should be adding a new 'method'. I
looked at rand.c but am a little confused at the moment.
Thanks.
Re
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 07:36:01AM -0700, David Sloat wrote:
> Just wondering if some sort of timeframe for the 0.9.7 beta4 release
> has been established... Any ideas?
No schedule planned, yet. Since beta3 several changes have been made
but concentration was put into 0.9.6f/g. I just had a look
I have a patch for OpenSSL that I'd like to submit. Should I just post it
on this list, or is there a better way to do it?
Also, my patch is based off of the OpenSSL cvs repository, not a specific
release. Is this acceptable?
--Joe Hartford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Engineer
Corestreet, L
Title: Timeframe for 0.9.7 beta4 release?
Just wondering if some sort of timeframe for the 0.9.7 beta4 release
has been established... Any ideas?
Thanks!
- Dave Sloat
Matthias Loepfe wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just want to give you some background information why AdNovum has
> choosen the let's call it the 'interceptor-way' of implementing
> the PKCS#11 functionality.
>
> We are working in an environment where the main purpose of the
> hardware security modules (HSM)
> Do you think this is appropriate for the 0.9.7 branch, or should I rather
> try it on the CVS mainline (to become 0.9.8) instead?
Für die CVS mainline ist es auf jeden Fall wichtiger. 0.9.7 wäre auch nett,
aber langfristig gesehen nicht so wichtig.
Ulf
Hello,
I'd like to add new cipher algorithm to openSSL, but there is no way how
to do it at the dev mailing list as I know. ;-(
If you have any experiance like that, please help me.
I want to know the way step by step if you can.
Any comments will be appreciated.
Thanks in adavance.
Sc
___
Hi
I just want to give you some background information why AdNovum has
choosen the let's call it the 'interceptor-way' of implementing
the PKCS#11 functionality.
We are working in an environment where the main purpose of the
hardware security modules (HSM) is not crypto acceleration but
secure s
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:23:16PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No , I am still looking for support on making the aix package work.
Your problem is not orginally caused by OpenSSL but by your OpenSSH-
installation.
I hereby propose you again to address your problem on the OpenSSH mailing
li
13 matches
Mail list logo
