[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Oct 6 21:38:18 2002]:
> Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> > OK, I just haven't seen further communication on this, so I've no
> > idea what conclusoins you came to. It's very possible that the
CA
> > certificate didn't match the issuer of the certificate you
wanted to
Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> OK, I just haven't seen further communication on this, so I've no
> idea what conclusoins you came to. It's very possible that the CA
> certificate didn't match the issuer of the certificate you wanted to
> verify. Do you have the possibility to send me the ce
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at
__ $Date: 2002/08/14 11:07:29 $
DEVELOPMENT STATE
o OpenSSL 0.9.8: Under development...
o OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta3: Released on July 30th, 2002
o OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta2: Released on Jun
Hi All,
I have ported SSL 0.9.6 onto Vxworks. I could successfully test all the
symmetric algorithms. But while testing RSA and DSA, I am not able to generate prime
numbers successfully and the trace always points here,
4e4f65 _rsa_test1 +169: _RSA_public_encrypt (8, 4e57cc, 3f61
OK, I just haven't seen further communication on this, so I've no
idea what conclusoins you came to. It's very possible that the CA
certificate didn't match the issuer of the certificate you wanted to
verify. Do you have the possibility to send me the certificates you
were using in your tes
[levitte - Sun Oct 6 11:07:19 2002]:
> I saw Stephens reply on this (it didn't get into RT *$%^&), but
> nothing more. Has this been resolved or is it still an issue? If
> the issue has been resolved, this ticket should be marked "resolved".
__
I've written some docs for the d2i/i2d functions which I've just
committed, this covers
d2i_RSAPrivateKey and friends too.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> levitte 06-Oct-2002 02:23:34
>
> Modified:crypto/des Tag: OpenSSL_0_9_7-stable des_old.h
> Log:
> Do not define crypt(). The supported function is DES_crypt() (an des_crypt()
> when backward compatibility is desired).
Hooray!
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http:/
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:01:28 +0200, "Dr.
Stephen Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> That is the problem. You should not create 00 in the serial
steve> file because the serial number 00 is used by default for the
steve> root CA. You should instead use 01. This
I saw Stephens reply on this (it didn't get into RT *$%^&), but
nothing more. Has this been resolved or is it still an issue? If
the issue has been resolved, this ticket should be marked "resolved".
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Aug 26 10:30:51 2002]:
> OpenSSL self-test report:
>
> OpenSSL
10 matches
Mail list logo