submiting as a bug (read the whole email ...)
Louis Solomon
www.SteelBytes.com
- Original Message -
From: Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: is SSL_CTX_new() thread safe (on win32) ?
ok,
(Note this approach keeps compression code in BIOs without duplicating it
in ssl/, so applications can use the BIOs independantly too. Also, new
compression methods are easier to add - eg. define a libbzip2-based BIO
and add a new compression id+hook in the SSL/TLS code).
I agree with this.
I´ve
levitte bn_div_words(0xC383,0x838B4B53,0x8000)
Hmm, a call like that gave me an aruthmetic error on Linux...
According to bc 0xC383838B4B53 / 0x8000 = 0x18707. The
result is 33 bits or in other words the operation *overflows*. According
to IA-32 manual overflow is
Hello again Lutz,
On Friday, November 29, 2002 at 1:20:25 PM +0100, Lutz Jänicke via RT wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:
- with 0.9.6g:
installing man3/SSL_write.3
/usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_write.pod
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 02 Dec 2002 10:51:30 +0100, Andy
Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
appro levitte bn_div_words(0xC383,0x838B4B53,0x8000)
appro
appro Hmm, a call like that gave me an aruthmetic error on Linux...
appro
appro According to bc 0xC383838B4B53 /
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:55:26AM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:
There is just an alert at some point:
| installing man3/engine.3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 34 of engine.pod:
head3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in
On December 2, 2002 05:53 am, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:55:26AM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:
There is just an alert at some point:
| installing man3/engine.3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 34
| of engine.pod: head3
Hi,
I read the discussion about the authorityKeyIdentifier and the problems
with Microsoft. So I used my contacts, packaged the problem and now it
looks for me like Microsoft also interprets the extension in the correct
way.
The problem is now where do you find the bug or problem?
I forward
This is the second answer and there are no doubts. They use the same
interpretation of the standard like OpenSSL. So if you find a situation
where Microsoft's software uses another interpretation then you should
feel free to contact these guys directly or refer Microsoft's support to
them.
This was the first answer from Microsoft. Perhaps my description was not
really perfect.
Michael
Original Message
Subject: RE: RFC 3280 and smartcardlogin
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 08:55:13 -0800
From: David Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Glenn Pittaway [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ah, that is a good point in the case where we saw
this, the source bio was a bio_s_mem, i.e. a memory
bio, so it was not doing r text-mode eol
translation. In other instances we do use the r
mode with file bios, and I guess that might explain
why we never saw it happen in those functions...
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 2 Dec 2002 22:30:20
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Ah, that is a good point in the case where we saw
rt this, the source bio was a bio_s_mem, i.e. a memory
rt bio, so it was not doing r text-mode eol
rt translation. In
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 2 Dec 2002 22:30:20
+0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Ah, that is a good point in the case where we saw
rt this, the source bio was a bio_s_mem, i.e. a memory
rt bio, so it was not doing r text-mode eol
rt translation. In
Sure.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Levitte - VMS
Whacker
Sent: Tuesday, 3 December 2002 9:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows CE (against
openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021201)
In message
Defining USE_SOCKETS before e_os.h is included probably helps :-).
This ticket is now resolved.
[jaenicke - Sun Dec 1 19:02:13 2002]:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Nov 30 23:00:17 2002]:
Building OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta4 and snap 20021129 on RedHat 8.0 (gcc
3.2
glibc 2.3) configured with
What is the status of the 0.9.6h defect release?
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
__
OpenSSL Project
16 matches
Mail list logo