[ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 5 released

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- The fifth beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.7 is now available from the OpenSSL FTP site ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/>. This beta contains quite a number of fixes since beta 4. This is NOT a final beta, even if that was the original plan. The updated plan

[ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.6h released

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- OpenSSL version 0.9.6h released === OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS http://www.openssl.org/ The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of version 0.9.6h of our open source toolkit for SSL/T

[openssl.org #387] Difference between SSL.H and SYMHACKS.H

2002-12-05 Thread Greaney, Kevin via RT
Hi, I ran across a difference between SSL.H and SYMHACKS.H: In SSL.H, there is: #define SSL_get_ex_data_X509_STORE_CTX_idx SSL_get_ex_data_X509_STORE_CTX_i This is embedded in about ten lines surrounded by an #ifdef VMS. SSL.H also does not include SYMHACKS.H, which I thoug

Re: [openssl.org #376] Possible SSL_CERT_FILE bug in 0.9.7 and 0.9.6

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:36:56 -0500, Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rsalz> > If the file pointed at with SSL_CERT_FILE is faulty in any way, the rsalz> > code will fall back to the built-in default. If that fails, an error rsalz> > is generated. How much does

Re: [openssl.org #376] Possible SSL_CERT_FILE bug in 0.9.7 and0.9.6

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:36:56 -0500, Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rsalz> > If the file pointed at with SSL_CERT_FILE is faulty in any way, the rsalz> > code will fall back to the built-in default. If that fails, an error rsalz> > is generated. How much does

[openssl.org #386] DJGPP patch for 0.9.7

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
This got resolved a few moments ago. -- Richard Levitte __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager

Re: DJGPP patch for 0.9.7

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 08:55:14 -0800 (PST), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: dkaufman> The recent patch for DJGPP paths didn't work. I think that this is dkaufman> what was intended. I will be away and not able to do any testing for dkaufman> about a week. "make

Re: [openssl.org #376] Possible SSL_CERT_FILE bug in 0.9.7 and 0.9.6

2002-12-05 Thread Rich Salz via RT
> If the file pointed at with SSL_CERT_FILE is faulty in any way, the > code will fall back to the built-in default. If that fails, an error > is generated. How much does that differ from what you said? Because you are saying: if there are any errors in the file named by $SSL_CERT_FILE, then

Re: [openssl.org #376] Possible SSL_CERT_FILE bug in 0.9.7 and 0.9.6

2002-12-05 Thread Rich Salz
If the file pointed at with SSL_CERT_FILE is faulty in any way, the code will fall back to the built-in default. If that fails, an error is generated. How much does that differ from what you said? Because you are saying: if there are any errors in the file named by $SSL_CERT_FILE, then I'll p

[openssl.org #386] DJGPP patch for 0.9.7

2002-12-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
The recent patch for DJGPP paths didn't work. I think that this is what was intended. I will be away and not able to do any testing for about a week. "make install_docs" is failing for multiple man pages, but I haven't been able to debug it before I have to leave. The patch is against the 2000212

TSU NOTIFICATION - encryption

2002-12-05 Thread Doug Kaufman
SUBMISSION TYPE: "TSU" SUBMITTED BY: Doug Kaufman SUBMITTED FOR: POINT OF CONTACT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PHONE and/or FAX: MANUFACTURER: (if relevant) PRODUCT NAME/MODEL #: openssl 0.9.7 ECCN: 5D002 NOTIFICATION: The attached patch is against the 20021204 snapshot of opens

DJGPP patch for 0.9.7

2002-12-05 Thread Doug Kaufman
The recent patch for DJGPP paths didn't work. I think that this is what was intended. I will be away and not able to do any testing for about a week. "make install_docs" is failing for multiple man pages, but I haven't been able to debug it before I have to leave. The patch is against the 20002120

Re: 0.9.7-beta4: test_rsa fails on ia64

2002-12-05 Thread Peter Poeml
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:57:02PM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote: > > > I managed to reproduce the problem under nue (IA-64 emulator for Linux) > > > and with gcc 2.96 (the one found in nue-fs-1.2-1). It's a compiler bug: > > > > > > *** ./crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c.orig Sun Nov 24 18:14:40 2002 > > >

Re: 0.9.7-beta4: test_rsa fails on ia64

2002-12-05 Thread Andy Polyakov
> > > the test 'trsa' in the testsuite fails on ia64: > > > > > >testing rsa conversions > > >p -> d > > >p -> p > > >d -> d > > >make[1]: *** [test_rsa] Error 1 > > >make[1]: Leaving directory > > >`/usr/src/packages/BUILD/openssl-0.9.7_beta4/test' > > >make: *** [t

[PATCH] openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021203 to build with Watcom C/C++(WIN32)

2002-12-05 Thread Charles Lecklider
This is a patch against openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021203 to enable building with the Watcom compiler. I've tested this on Win2k with Watcom C/C++ 11.0c, and the library produced passes all tests (except the verify one, since the Watcom clib doesn't do file globbing - I intend to submit anothe

Re: 0.9.7-beta4: test_rsa fails on ia64

2002-12-05 Thread Peter Poeml
Hi, On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:14:42AM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote: > > the test 'trsa' in the testsuite fails on ia64: > > > >testing rsa conversions > >p -> d > >p -> p > >d -> d > >make[1]: *** [test_rsa] Error 1 > >make[1]: Leaving directory > >`/usr/src/packages/BU

Requiring multithreaded apps to provide dynamic locking upcalls

2002-12-05 Thread Bertie
At 01:15 AM 12/5/02 +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > >[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 4 12:08:18 2002]: > >> Whilst conducting some testing with OpenSSL 0.9.7beta4 and the nCipher >> chil plugin, I observed the following issues: >> >> 1. Lack of threadsafety if app fails to support new OpenSSL

Re: [openssl.org #385] 0.9.7-stable build fails on OpenBSD 2.9

2002-12-05 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:18:44AM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > OK, I just made a change so it depends on the value of OpenBSD. Great - it works for me. Thanks Richard. Regards, joe __ OpenSSL Project

[openssl.org #385] 0.9.7-stable build fails on OpenBSD 2.9

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
OK, I just made a change so it depends on the value of OpenBSD. This ticket is now resolved. [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Dec 5 11:12:17 2002]: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 > 09:36:15 +, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > jorton> Ah, I've found this in : > jorton>

Re: [openssl.org #385] 0.9.7-stable build fails on OpenBSD 2.9

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:36:15 +, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: jorton> Ah, I've found this in : jorton> jorton> #define OpenBSD 200105 /* OpenBSD version (year & month). */ jorton> #define OpenBSD2_9 1/* OpenBSD 2.9 */ jorton> jorton>

Re: [openssl.org #385] 0.9.7-stable build fails on OpenBSD 2.9

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:36:15 +, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: jorton> Ah, I've found this in : jorton> jorton> #define OpenBSD 200105 /* OpenBSD version (year & month). */ jorton> #define OpenBSD2_9 1/* OpenBSD 2.9 */ jorton> jorton>

Re: [openssl.org #385] 0.9.7-stable build fails on OpenBSD 2.9

2002-12-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:26:58AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:03:20 >+0100 (MET), " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > rt> gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H > rt> -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_END

Re: [openssl.org #385] 0.9.7-stable build fails on OpenBSD 2.9

2002-12-05 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:26:58AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:03:20 >+0100 (MET), " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > rt> gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H > rt> -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_ENDI

Re: [openssl.org #385] 0.9.7-stable build fails on OpenBSD 2.9

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:03:20 +0100 (MET), " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rt> gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H rt> -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer rt> -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -c hw_cryp

Re: [openssl.org #385] 0.9.7-stable build fails on OpenBSD 2.9

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:03:20 +0100 (MET), " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rt> gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H rt> -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer rt> -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -c hw_crypt

[openssl.org #385] 0.9.7-stable build fails on OpenBSD 2.9

2002-12-05 Thread via RT
gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -c hw_cryptodev.c hw_cryptodev.c:49: crypto/cryptodev.h: No such file or directory (I think that header is only available in OpenBSD

[openssl.org #384] bug-report

2002-12-05 Thread Yue Wu via RT
Hi I have a bug-report. when I compile the openssl-0.9.6g on AIX5L,I found some problem. my compile envirement is OS: AIX5L specfile: (See attached file: opensslg.spec) I can success in "make" process ,but faulted in "make test" process without "no-dsa" option the error message is below. ---