-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
The fifth beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.7 is now available from the
OpenSSL FTP site ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/>. This beta
contains quite a number of fixes since beta 4.
This is NOT a final beta, even if that was the original plan. The
updated plan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
OpenSSL version 0.9.6h released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of version
0.9.6h of our open source toolkit for SSL/T
Hi,
I ran across a difference between SSL.H and SYMHACKS.H:
In SSL.H, there is:
#define SSL_get_ex_data_X509_STORE_CTX_idx
SSL_get_ex_data_X509_STORE_CTX_i
This is embedded in about ten lines surrounded by an #ifdef VMS. SSL.H
also does not include
SYMHACKS.H, which I thoug
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:36:56 -0500, Rich
Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rsalz> > If the file pointed at with SSL_CERT_FILE is faulty in any way, the
rsalz> > code will fall back to the built-in default. If that fails, an error
rsalz> > is generated. How much does
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:36:56 -0500, Rich
Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rsalz> > If the file pointed at with SSL_CERT_FILE is faulty in any way, the
rsalz> > code will fall back to the built-in default. If that fails, an error
rsalz> > is generated. How much does
This got resolved a few moments ago.
--
Richard Levitte
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec
2002 08:55:14 -0800 (PST), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dkaufman> The recent patch for DJGPP paths didn't work. I think that this is
dkaufman> what was intended. I will be away and not able to do any testing for
dkaufman> about a week. "make
> If the file pointed at with SSL_CERT_FILE is faulty in any way, the
> code will fall back to the built-in default. If that fails, an error
> is generated. How much does that differ from what you said?
Because you are saying: if there are any errors in the file named by
$SSL_CERT_FILE, then
If the file pointed at with SSL_CERT_FILE is faulty in any way, the
code will fall back to the built-in default. If that fails, an error
is generated. How much does that differ from what you said?
Because you are saying: if there are any errors in the file named by
$SSL_CERT_FILE, then I'll p
The recent patch for DJGPP paths didn't work. I think that this is
what was intended. I will be away and not able to do any testing for
about a week. "make install_docs" is failing for multiple man pages,
but I haven't been able to debug it before I have to leave.
The patch is against the 2000212
SUBMISSION TYPE: "TSU"
SUBMITTED BY: Doug Kaufman
SUBMITTED FOR:
POINT OF CONTACT:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PHONE and/or FAX:
MANUFACTURER: (if relevant)
PRODUCT NAME/MODEL #: openssl 0.9.7
ECCN: 5D002
NOTIFICATION: The attached patch is against the 20021204 snapshot of
opens
The recent patch for DJGPP paths didn't work. I think that this is
what was intended. I will be away and not able to do any testing for
about a week. "make install_docs" is failing for multiple man pages,
but I haven't been able to debug it before I have to leave.
The patch is against the 20002120
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:57:02PM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> > > I managed to reproduce the problem under nue (IA-64 emulator for Linux)
> > > and with gcc 2.96 (the one found in nue-fs-1.2-1). It's a compiler bug:
> > >
> > > *** ./crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c.orig Sun Nov 24 18:14:40 2002
> > >
> > > the test 'trsa' in the testsuite fails on ia64:
> > >
> > >testing rsa conversions
> > >p -> d
> > >p -> p
> > >d -> d
> > >make[1]: *** [test_rsa] Error 1
> > >make[1]: Leaving directory
> > >`/usr/src/packages/BUILD/openssl-0.9.7_beta4/test'
> > >make: *** [t
This is a patch against openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021203 to enable
building with the Watcom compiler. I've tested this on Win2k with Watcom
C/C++ 11.0c, and the library produced passes all tests (except the
verify one, since the Watcom clib doesn't do file globbing - I intend to
submit anothe
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:14:42AM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> > the test 'trsa' in the testsuite fails on ia64:
> >
> >testing rsa conversions
> >p -> d
> >p -> p
> >d -> d
> >make[1]: *** [test_rsa] Error 1
> >make[1]: Leaving directory
> >`/usr/src/packages/BU
At 01:15 AM 12/5/02 +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
>
>[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 4 12:08:18 2002]:
>
>> Whilst conducting some testing with OpenSSL 0.9.7beta4 and the nCipher
>> chil plugin, I observed the following issues:
>>
>> 1. Lack of threadsafety if app fails to support new OpenSSL
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:18:44AM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> OK, I just made a change so it depends on the value of OpenBSD.
Great - it works for me. Thanks Richard.
Regards,
joe
__
OpenSSL Project
OK, I just made a change so it depends on the value of OpenBSD.
This ticket is now resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Dec 5 11:12:17 2002]:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002
> 09:36:15 +, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> jorton> Ah, I've found this in :
> jorton>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:36:15 +, Joe
Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jorton> Ah, I've found this in :
jorton>
jorton> #define OpenBSD 200105 /* OpenBSD version (year & month). */
jorton> #define OpenBSD2_9 1/* OpenBSD 2.9 */
jorton>
jorton>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:36:15 +, Joe
Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jorton> Ah, I've found this in :
jorton>
jorton> #define OpenBSD 200105 /* OpenBSD version (year & month). */
jorton> #define OpenBSD2_9 1/* OpenBSD 2.9 */
jorton>
jorton>
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:26:58AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:03:20
>+0100 (MET), " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> rt> gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
> rt> -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_END
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:26:58AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:03:20
>+0100 (MET), " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> rt> gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
> rt> -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_ENDI
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:03:20
+0100 (MET), " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
rt> -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
rt> -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -c hw_cryp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:03:20
+0100 (MET), " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
rt> -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
rt> -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -c hw_crypt
gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
-DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -c hw_cryptodev.c
hw_cryptodev.c:49: crypto/cryptodev.h: No such file or directory
(I think that header is only available in OpenBSD
Hi
I have a bug-report. when I compile the openssl-0.9.6g on AIX5L,I found
some problem.
my compile envirement is
OS: AIX5L
specfile: (See attached file: opensslg.spec)
I can success in "make" process ,but faulted in "make test" process without
"no-dsa" option
the error message is below.
---
27 matches
Mail list logo