[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 10 15:10:09 2003]:
>
Ugh, can't quote the original message...
This refers to OpenSSL 0.9.6X which does indeed only show the DN of the
CSR (or pseudo CSR in the case of SPKACs) including the old mishandling
of multibyte string types.
That's one reason why I didn't
Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 3 08:21:38 2003]:
When a non-blocking SSL_accept() returns -1 with SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ
or
SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE set, the appropriate thing to do is to call
SSL_accept() again.
This is fine, but the current state machine in ssl3_acce
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:27:56 +0100 (MET), "Lutz Jaenicke via RT"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 3 06:45:12 2003]:
>
> > I'm trying to compile 0.9.7 with Borland C++ 5.5 and NASM 0.98.35 on
> > Windows XP Professional SP1 with all updates.
> >
> > I did
> >
>
[levitte - Fri Dec 20 09:28:56 2002]:
> Looks to me like everything was successful, really, even index.txt is
> up to date. Do you have the possibility to debug and find out
exactly
> where the segfault happened?
>
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 18 17:22:44 2002]:
>
> > While executin
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jan 2 13:14:21 2003]:
> Hello,
>
> I would configure and install a certification from openssl for
Windows
> 2000 IIS.
This is not a bug or enhancement report with respect to the OpenSSL
package. Please ask your question on the openssl-users mailing list.
Be
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Tim Rice wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Megele, Martin via RT wrote:
>
> > Undefined first referenced
> > symbol in file
> > strcasecmp ca.o
>
> Try adding -lresolv
>
> > ftime
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 3 06:45:12 2003]:
> I'm trying to compile 0.9.7 with Borland C++ 5.5 and NASM 0.98.35 on
> Windows XP Professional SP1 with all updates.
>
> I did
>
> perl Configure BC-32 no-idea no-mdc2 no-rc5
> ms\do_nasm
> make -f ms\bcb.mak
>
> It fails at:
>
>
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 3 08:21:38 2003]:
> When a non-blocking SSL_accept() returns -1 with SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ
> or
> SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE set, the appropriate thing to do is to call
> SSL_accept() again.
>
> This is fine, but the current state machine in ssl3_accept() doesn't
>
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Megele, Martin via RT wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> i try building openssl-0.9.7 on an ncr server using ./Configure ncr-scde
> ( uname -a: cti1dev cti1dev 4.0 3.0 3360,3430-R Pentium(TM)-MCA
> login info: Welcome to the NCR MP-RAS SVR4 UNIX System
> UNIX System V Rel
Hello,
i try building openssl-0.9.7 on an ncr server using ./Configure ncr-scde
( uname -a: cti1dev cti1dev 4.0 3.0 3360,3430-R Pentium(TM)-MCA
login info: Welcome to the NCR MP-RAS SVR4 UNIX System
UNIX System V Release 4.0 (cti1dev) (pts/0)
)
and i get the following linker error
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 10:35:16PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> The "2" is just sort of a counter which is needed to allow more than
> [...]
Hi, I have chosen another packaging method:
Version 0.9.6h will consist only of the needed DLLs to link applications
build against it.
The packag
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 10 Jan
2003 08:53:37 -0800 (PST), Tim Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
tim> Before moving to a read-only tree I had one platform's build modifying
tim> some of the generated source files that another platform would use/modify
tim> causing some problems. Moving
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
>
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Jan 4 19:22:11 2003]:
> > Now I clean up after patch and remove files made from .in files
> > find . -name "*.orig" -exec rm -f {} \;
> > rm -f Makefile.ssl apps/CA.pl apps/der_chop \
> > crypto/o
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:40:18 +0100, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> > Unfortunately, about -R/-rpath, I've avoided it so far for exactly the
appro> > reason you mentioned: it doesn't quite support moving libraries to a
appro> > dofferent place and sti
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:40:18 +0100, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> > And also, I have understood
appro> > that libssl.so does need a -R/-rpath to be able to find libcrypto.so,
appro> > on which it depends.
appro>
appro> This is not true. The fact th
> Unfortunately, about -R/-rpath, I've avoided it so far for exactly the
> reason you mentioned: it doesn't quite support moving libraries to a
> dofferent place and still have it work.
And that is what I'm suggesting to adhere to. I.e. to avoid it (and even
to remove it from tru64!) and leave thi
I just committed the final change that makes 'make install' print a recommendation on
handling the shared libraries of such a thing was installed anywhere else than in
/usr/lib.
The text that's shown is rather close to the one suggested by Jeff, with additions
about pkg-config and a reordering
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:03:00 +0100, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> There is another option, "The Right Thing":-)
Of course :-).
Unfortunately, about -R/-rpath, I've avoided it so far for exactly the
reason you mentioned: it doesn't quite support mo
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 10 16:35:08 2003]:
> I think a sufficient requirement is that files in the source tree that
> are relative links need to be recreated as relative links within the
> platform dependent directory.
exactly.
> If you just leave out the "-o -type l"
> you won't make any
I'll try the next snapshot.Thanks.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [
I think a sufficient requirement is that files in the source tree that
are relative links need to be recreated as relative links within the
platform dependent directory. If you just leave out the "-o -type l"
you won't make any of the links, and the include/openssl directory will
be empty, which
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> OpenSSL Shared Libraries have been installed in:
>[directory name]
>
> If this directory is not in a standard system path for dynamic/shared
> libraries, then you will have problems linking and executing
> applications
OK, I've hacked a little. Please try the following patch on a 0.9.7
snapshot, and put the attached openssl-shared.txt in doc/:
Index: Makefile.org
===
RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/Makefile.org,v
retrieving revision 1.154.2.49
di
OK, I've hacked a little. Please try the following patch on a 0.9.7
snapshot, and put the attached openssl-shared.txt in doc/:
Index: Makefile.org
===
RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/Makefile.org,v
retrieving revision 1.154.2.49
dif
Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
Hello Richard,
It's unfortunate that cryptoki.h is GPLd, or I would put it in our contribution area.
GPL is not compatible with the OpenSSL license. Is it possible to get a different cryptoki.h?
Also, is conf.h really necssary?
conf.h is only incuded if HAVE_CON
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Jan 4 19:22:11 2003]:
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Nick Briggs via RT wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > # Place yourself outside of the OpenSSL source tree. In
> > # this example, the environment variable OPENSSL_SOURCE
> > # is assumed to contain the absolute Ope
I've removed '-o -type l' from the note in CHANGES. I've also added a note on
separate build directories at the end of INSTALL. Finally, I've made sure that
test/testgen removes the files it generates if they exist before the actual generation.
I've tested this against a read-only source tree
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Jan 4 12:04:29 2003]:
> These instructions, from the CHANGES file:
>
> ==
> *) Add appropriate support for separate platform-dependent build
> directories. The recommended way to make a platform-dependent
> build directory is the following (tested o
It's unfortunate that cryptoki.h is GPLd, or I would put it in our contribution area.
GPL is not compatible with the OpenSSL license. Is it possible to get a different
cryptoki.h?
Also, is conf.h really necssary?
I'm willing to do the transformation needed for this bundle to work properly wit
Hi,
I have made a client - server connexion using TLS,
In order to check the cert,
I use the
SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations function to load the AC cert,
And
SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file function to load the client cert.
Which function should I use in order to load the CRL file ?
Thanks
__
Hi,
I use BIO to make a client-server connexion,
For the server, How can I get the IP of the client when a connexion is
accepted
Thanks
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mai
Quite. I've committed that change.
This ticket is now resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 10 08:44:13 2003]:
>
>
> During our memory stress testing we discovered a bug in the
> BN_generate_prime() function. In the case that the creation of a new BN_CTX
> fails (line 143), execution drops
I've made the corrections (most were already there) in 0.9.7a-dev and 0.9.8-dev.
This ticket is now resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 10 08:44:04 2003]:
> Hello,
>
> Some typos in the openssl man pages were discovered (see NetBSD's PR
> misc/19627
> http://www.NetBSD.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-
36 matches
Mail list logo
