Re: Inconsistent behavior of ECPublicKey_{set,get}_octet_string()?

2003-02-19 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003, Nils Larsch wrote: > > I guess the reason for this was to simplify the OpenSSL ASN1 macros/ > functions (you can call the corresponding de- encode functions in a > row, without taking care of the pointer). > It was indeed for that purpose. When the old ASN1 code built enc

Re: [openssl.org #511] BUG: crypto/ec/ec_key.c:EC_KEY_dup()

2003-02-19 Thread Bodo Moeller
Bodo Moeller via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [nothing] RT has cut off the message, which said that the fix will be in the next snapshot (which should be the latest snapshot by now). -- Bodo Möller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP http://www.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/Mitarbeiter/moeller/0x36d2c658.html

Re: Inconsistent behavior of ECPublicKey_{set,get}_octet_string()?

2003-02-19 Thread Nils Larsch
Eric Cronin wrote: ... > I'm working on an implementation of forward-secure signature > algorithms, whose keys can sometimes contain multiple RSA/DSA/ECDSA/etc > keys. I haven't tackled the best way to PKCS encode these > forward-secure keys yet, so in the meantime I have just been using a > simpl

Re: Inconsistent behavior of ECPublicKey_{set,get}_octet_string()?

2003-02-19 Thread Eric Cronin
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 02:48 PM, Nils Larsch wrote: Eric Cronin wrote: I am trying to find the analogue of the {i2d,d2i}_{DSA,RSA}PublicKey functions for ECDSA EC_KEY's. May I ask why ? For X9.62 you don't need them (, or do you mean a X509 SubjectPublicKeyInfo object ?). I'm

Re: Inconsistent behavior of ECPublicKey_{set,get}_octet_string()?

2003-02-19 Thread Nils Larsch
Eric Cronin wrote: > I am trying to find the analogue of the {i2d,d2i}_{DSA,RSA}PublicKey > functions for ECDSA EC_KEY's. May I ask why ? For X9.62 you don't need them (, or do you mean a X509 SubjectPublicKeyInfo object ?). > As best I can tell, >

Re: Inconsistent behavior of ECPublicKey_{set,get}_octet_string()?

2003-02-19 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003, Eric Cronin wrote: > I am trying to find the analogue of the {i2d,d2i}_{DSA,RSA}PublicKey > functions for ECDSA EC_KEY's. As best I can tell, > i2dECPKParameters+ECPublicKey_get_octet_string and > d2iECPKParameters+ECPublicKey_set_octet_string are the way to do the > enc

Inconsistent behavior of ECPublicKey_{set,get}_octet_string()?

2003-02-19 Thread Eric Cronin
I am trying to find the analogue of the {i2d,d2i}_{DSA,RSA}PublicKey functions for ECDSA EC_KEY's. As best I can tell, i2dECPKParameters+ECPublicKey_get_octet_string and d2iECPKParameters+ECPublicKey_set_octet_string are the way to do the encoding/decoding of just the public portions of an EC_

RE: [openssl.org #512] make OpenSSl-0.9.6a

2003-02-19 Thread Guttormsen Stian via RT
Thanks. I have already done that and it resolved the problem. SG -Original Message- From: Bodo Moeller via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19. februar 2003 17:33 To: Guttormsen Stian Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [openssl.org #512] make OpenSSl-0.9.6a This is not an OpenSSL bug

[openssl.org #514] Bug in OpenSSL????

2003-02-19 Thread Ralph via RT
Hi, on AIX (64bit) I noticed a major problem with non-blocking sockets. Methods SSL_connect(), SSL_read() and SSL_write() should return SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ or SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE if they need to complete their tasks but the socket couldn't handle all the work. But instead, the methods return

[openssl.org #512] make OpenSSl-0.9.6a

2003-02-19 Thread Bodo Moeller via RT
This is not an OpenSSL bug; you should install gcc, and possibly remove /usr/ucb from the PATH. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTEC

[openssl.org #511] BUG: crypto/ec/ec_key.c:EC_KEY_dup()

2003-02-19 Thread Bodo Moeller via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #509]

2003-02-19 Thread Humberto Valiente via RT
>Hello > >(a beginner using linux+ssl) > >I tried to install the latest version of openssl (openssl-0.9.7.tar.gz) >under Suse Linux 7.2 but it makes no results. >The make and make install command doesn´t work. > >Then I tried with the version 9.6h.tar.gz and the make and make install >runs. The

[ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7a and 0.9.6i released

2003-02-19 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- OpenSSL version 0.9.7a and 0.9.6i released == OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS http://www.openssl.org/ The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of version 0.9.7a of our open so

[openssl.org #510] bug at compilation

2003-02-19 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
Fix committed. It will appear in OpenSSL 0.9.7a and on. This ticket is now resolved. [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Feb 18 12:29:43 2003]: > Hello ! > > I'm trying to compile OpenSSL on a Windows 2000 server with Borland > C++ > Builder 5 using nasm. > > With the OpenSSL 0.9.7 stable snapshot 2003

[openssl.org #513] [PATCH] Parallel make

2003-02-19 Thread Witold Filipczyk via RT
Parallel make, eg. make -j 7 fails now. This patch correct it. -- Witold Filipczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAI

[openssl.org #512] make OpenSSl-0.9.6a

2003-02-19 Thread Guttormsen Stian via RT
I get this message when I try to compile OpenSSL-0.9.6a with the command make: # make making all in crypto... cc -I. -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_ULTRASPARC -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8plus -xO5 -xstrconst -xdepend -Xa

[PATCH] Parallel make

2003-02-19 Thread Witold Filipczyk
Parallel make, eg. make -j 7 fails now. This patch correct it. -- Witold Filipczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- openssl-0.9.7.old/crypto/Makefile.ssl Fri Dec 20 15:28:45 2002 +++ openssl-0.9.7/crypto/Makefile.ssl Sun Feb 16 20:02:43 2003 @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ top: @(cd ..; $(MAKE) DIRS=$(

Re: IMPORTANT: please test snapshot openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030214.tar.gz

2003-02-19 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 06:08:34PM +0100, Bodo Moeller wrote: > Please test snapshot openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030214.tar.gz > (or later), which will be available today around 8 p.m. GMT at > ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot;type=d >. > > We plan to release version 0.9.7a soon (next week if all go