[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 13 09:24:50 2003]:
How do you do?
I found it is impossible to create RPM packages
of Openssl 0.9.7c with the openssl.spec in the
source archive. There is an failure in Makefile.org.
Mode of directory /usr/lib/pkgconfig is set to
0644.
Thanks. The bug has
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Cert1 has keyUsage keyCertSign set. Its issuer and subject names are
identical.
Cert2 includes keyUsage and does *not* have keyCertSign set. Its issuer and
subject names are identical *and* identical to Cert1.
The two certificates have
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003, Dave Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Cert1 has keyUsage keyCertSign set. Its issuer and subject names are
identical.
Cert2 includes keyUsage and does *not* have keyCertSign set. Its issuer and
subject names are identical *and*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 6 17:08:31 2003]:
While running the make command to build version 9.7c, I get the
following errors. My system is OpenBSD i386. Please help me fix this
bug, if it is in fact a bug with OpenSSL
...
des-586.s:2458: Error: Unimplemented segment type 151680 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 6 17:05:28 2003]:
Hi,
while upgrading to 0.9.7c on my old SunOS 4.1.4 box I am getting the
following error:
| making all in test...
| if [ = hpux-shared -o = darwin-shared ] ; then \
| gcc -o destest -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_SUNOS
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Well yes except there's a broken certificate workaround in there...
One rather important CA excludes basicConstraints in its CA certificate but
includes keyUsage+keyCertSign so it will tolerate this case.
Very broken certificate. Rather than
On November 20, 2003 08:49 pm, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
I think piggy-backing would be the best approach. At this point, I'm
seriously messing the function pointer int (*poll)(void) in
RAND_METHOD (I can add it to 0.9.8-dev, but I think we need to do
something for 0.9.7-stable as
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:07:25 -0500, Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
geoff For 0.9.7-stable, I suggest the following hack:
geoff
geoff have hwcrhk_rand_bytes and hwcrhk_rand_status check a static variable
geoff (initilized to 0), and if it's 0, they will grab
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:47:45 -0500, Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
geoff On November 21, 2003 05:29 pm, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
geoff An option that leaves the decision right back into the hands of the
geoff user would be to have an extra
tst
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo
