[openssl.org #1123] 0.9.8-beta6 compile error
WinXP, VC6 set OPTS=no-asm no-engine no-krb5 no-hw Second error (engines directory) still in openssl-SNAP-20050627: cl /Fotmp32.dbg\e_4758cca.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32.dbg /MDd /W3 /WX /Zi /Yd /Od /nologo -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32 -D_DEBUG -DL_ENDIAN -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -D DEBUG -DDSO_WIN32 /Fdout32 -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE -DOPENSSL_NO_HW -c .\engines\e_4758cca.c e_4758cca.c .\engines\e_4758cca.c(62) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'openss l/engine.h': No such file or directory NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl' : return code '0x2' Stop. Sorry for late reply, Thanks, -cipo __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[openssl.org #1123] 0.9.8-beta6 compile error
[guest - Mon Jun 27 11:31:55 2005]: WinXP, VC6 set OPTS=no-asm no-engine no-krb5 no-hw Second error (engines directory) still in openssl-SNAP-20050627: cl /Fotmp32.dbg\e_4758cca.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32.dbg /MDd /W3 /WX /Zi /Yd /Od /nologo -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32 -D_DEBUG -DL_ENDIAN -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -D DEBUG -DDSO_WIN32 /Fdout32 -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE -DOPENSSL_NO_HW -c .\engines\e_4758cca.c e_4758cca.c .\engines\e_4758cca.c(62) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'openss l/engine.h': No such file or directory NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl' : return code '0x2' Stop. Sorry for late reply, Thanks, -cipo __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[openssl.org #1140] openssl pkcs12 sefaults on invalid input
the attached file is corrupted. Still it might be better to handle that than to segfault. Tested on linux 2.6.*/ debian sarge with openssl 0.9.8-beta6. the file password is password. (gdb) r pkcs12 -in /home/aj/test-trunk.p12 -noout -info Starting program: /home/aj/opentest/src/openssl-0.9.8-beta6/apps/openssl pkcs12 -in /home/aj/test-trunk.p12 -noout -info Enter Import Password: MAC Iteration 2048 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xb7ed03a6 in SHA1_Update () from /home/aj/opentest/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (gdb) bt #0 0xb7ed03a6 in SHA1_Update () from /home/aj/opentest/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (gdb) __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[openssl.org #1141] E-mail exchange down
Can't receive any e-mail __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[openssl.org #1142] E-mail exchange down
Can't receive any e-mail __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: windows ce port patches
hi Steven, sorry for the delay i was on vacation:-) of course i use you wcecompat lib at the first place, but i've to modify it a bit. first the makefiles to update to the current ce versions: http://www.lfarkas.org/pocket-pc/openssl/make.patch second have to remove a lots of 'fixes' from wcecompat which already fixed in eVC++ 4 sp4 so remove these include files (i'm not 100% check them, but it seems so): include/assert.h include/ctype.h include/malloc.h include/math.h include/memory.h include/setjmp.h include/stdarg.h include/stddef.h include/stdio.h include/stdlib.h include/string.h include/time.h but it would need a bit more time and more carefull examination to see what can be dropped (or fix) in the current wcecompat to update to the latest eVC++ 4 sp4. another patch which i create this one: http://www.lfarkas.org/pocket-pc/openssl/openssl-ce.patch which are mainly bugfix in the current openssl code and only win ce specific so it could be apply without hurt other part of the openssl code. another stange problem for after reading this mail: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-usersm=111712574012234w=2 why have to change the TARGETCPU=ARM? since the eVC++ setup use the ARMV4 as the target cpu, but it's true that openssl can't build without it. and there are a few more problems... i look into this port problem again in this week and sen my new results. ps. another note that the current 0.9.8-beta6 is totaly broken and i fall back to the 0.9.7g after start with the new beta:-( yours. Steven Reddie wrote: Hi Levente, I did the Windows CE port but have not found the time to complete an update for the latest compiler and SDKs. I think the last kit I used for the current OpenSSL support was eVC 3.0 for PPC2002. OPENSSL_SYS_WINCE is the correct tag to use; you'll find these in the source code already. I changed the makefiles and wcecompat extensively to support more devices but I don't know when I'll get around to digging it up again. As a minimal fix you shouldn't find that you need to change very much to get things working with eVC 4.x. Regards, Steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Farkas Levente Sent: Tuesday, 14 June 2005 10:54 PM To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: windows ce port hi, it seems to me that no one realy cares about the windows ce port of openssl. so i look around and try to fix the problems with the current stable release 0.9.7g and the current embedded visual c++. i'll send the required patch to be able to compile on windows ce. but i wouldn't like to touch other enviroments, so in some places i'd like to ifdef my modification. which macro should i use for this (what is the prefered way): - WCEPLATFORM - UNDER_CE - WIN32_CE - OPENSSL_SYS_WINCE thanks in advance. yours. ps. does this the right list for sending patches or should i use openssl-users (since i saw previous post on that list)? -- Levente Si vis pacem para bellum! __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: windows ce port patches
another patch which i create this one: http://www.lfarkas.org/pocket-pc/openssl/openssl-ce.patch which are mainly bugfix in the current openssl code and only win ce specific so it could be apply without hurt other part of the openssl code. As for crtypto/dso/dso_win32.c. - h = LoadLibrary(filename); + h = LoadLibrary((LPCTSTR)filename); Just casting to LPCTSTR doesn't make everything right. TCHAR is always WCHAR under CE, while filename is *always* char*. You either have to explicitly call LoadLibraryA or detect when conversion to WCHAR is due and convert. In HEAD branch it's suggested to fix with explicit call to LoadLibraryA. +#ifndef OPENSSL_SYS_WINCE sym = GetProcAddress(*ptr, symname); +#else + sym = GetProcAddress(*ptr, (LPCWSTR)symname); +#endif Same applies to GetProcAddress. symnane is *always* char* and casting to LPCWSTR doesn't make it Unicode. See end of http://cvs.openssl.org/getfile/openssl/crypto/dso/dso_win32.c?v=1.22 for proper solution. Idea is to explicitly call GetProcAddressA when available [should be implemented in WCE=3.0] or implement own GetProcAddressA shim, which would interface to native GetProcAddressW. As for crypto/rand/rand_win.c. Why? Then why buf[64]? Its usage below is controlled by more complicated #if statement, meaning that suggested patch will break something. As for crypto/rc2/rc2_skey.c. Would it be enough to initialize ki with NULL? Does it really have to be c? A. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #1114] Bug: RC4 on IA64 and OpenSSH
On Sun Jun 26 10:42:05 2005, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: When building OpenSSH 4.1p1 against OpenSSL 0.9.7g on Itanium (Linux) the OpenSSH 'make tests' regression tests fail wrt the RC4 cipher. Verify ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot/openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20050627.tar.gz *as it becomes available* and report back. A. Yes! That seems to do the trick. -- Iain Morgan __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still a few issues. Release delayed...
Hi, The release is delayed again. There are a couple of issues that I think need to be checked. I hope we'll be through with this in a week. Cheers, Richard - Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up. -- C.S. Lewis __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #1105] DTLS HelloVerifyRequest PATCH
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 02:30:40 -0700, nagendra modadugu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: nagendra It turns out that the Version field was omitted from the nagendra HelloVerify message in the internet draft. The document nagendra will be corrected. So the bug report can be removed, right? (and *please* keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] among the recipients. It's quite hard to follow history in the database when people keep skipping that address) Cheers, Richard - Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up. -- C.S. Lewis __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
