[openssl.org #1552] mingw patch for openssl-0.9.8e

2008-04-17 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
I have applied both the patch from Roumen Petrov and the Fixup from Alon
Bar-Lev.
I don't have a mingw environment to actually verify the correct
operation. Please check out the next snapshot and verify that everything
is working now as expected.

Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[openssl.org #1451] Re: PATCH (Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32)

2008-04-17 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
Closing as well according to #1552
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [openssl.org #1552] mingw patch for openssl-0.9.8e

2008-04-17 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Thank you!!!
Will check.

On 4/17/08, Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have applied both the patch from Roumen Petrov and the Fixup from Alon
  Bar-Lev.
  I don't have a mingw environment to actually verify the correct
  operation. Please check out the next snapshot and verify that everything
  is working now as expected.

  Best regards,
 Lutz

 __
  OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
  Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
  Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[openssl.org #1659] NULL pointer dereference in rsautl bug and patch

2008-04-17 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
I have applied a different modification which is a little bit more in
line with the handling in other applications (where the handling seems
to be correct).
  http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17067

Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[openssl.org #1607] Bug in openssl - file apps.c

2008-04-17 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
Thanks, fixed in
  http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17069 (0.9.8-stable)
  http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17068 (HEAD)
  

Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [openssl.org #1552] mingw patch for openssl-0.9.8e

2008-04-17 Thread Roumen Petrov

10x Lutz,

I just synchronize my local version with cvs and left one non-important
difference - some tabs see openssl-cvs-2008018.diff.gz (may be I lost
them after copy/paste diff from browser into local file).

Alon Bar-Lev wrote:

Thank you!!!
Will check.

On 4/17/08, Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have applied both the patch from Roumen Petrov and the Fixup from Alon
 Bar-Lev.
 I don't have a mingw environment to actually verify the correct
 operation. Please check out the next snapshot and verify that everything
 is working now as expected.

 Best regards,
Lutz



Roumen



openssl-cvs-2008018.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip


Will this change causes lock up?

2008-04-17 Thread Zhichao Hong
I have sent email about a client hangs when trying to communicating
with server using 0.9.7e version of the openssl. When looking into the
debugger stack trace, the ssl3_read_n blocks forever in the s3_pkt.c.
When I browsed the cvs change history, the following issue was fixed
later in Nov 2006.  I am wondering without the fix (i.e. setting
s-first_packet to 0), will it cause some kind of locked up?

--- s3_pkt.c2004/05/15 17:46:50 1.46.2.7
+++ s3_pkt.c2006/11/29 14:44:07 1.46.2.8
@@ -275,11 +275,7 @@
n2s(p,rr-length);

/* Lets check version */
-   if (s-first_packet)
-   {
-   s-first_packet=0;
-   }
-   else
+   if (!s-first_packet)
{
if (version != s-version)
{

Any insight will be very appreciated.

Regards,
Zhichao

-- 
Zhichao Hong, CSDP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]