hi,
since a few days the current snapshots seem to provoke a
tar: A lone zero block at
has there been any change in producing the tar.gz?
/P
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
There appear to be problems with the test data in these three cases.
I've reported this and hope to see it resolved soon. In OpenSSL HEAD and
1.0.1 by uncommenting out a line in the perl script (to use and older
date for validation) you can still run the older tests: they all pass.
Steve.
--
Dr
[steve - Sun Dec 11 17:25:42 2011]:
There appear to be problems with the test data in these three cases.
I've reported this and hope to see it resolved soon. In OpenSSL HEAD and
1.0.1 by uncommenting out a line in the perl script (to use and older
date for validation) you can still run the
is acceptable
- comments to indicate in s_client the (non-)usefulness of
th primalaty tests for non known group parameters.
diff -r -c5 openssl-1.0.1-stable-SNAP-20111211/apps/s_client.c openssl-1.0.1-stable-SNAP-20111211PS/apps/s_client.c
*** openssl-1.0.1-stable-SNAP-20111211/apps
I'm getting more SSL timeouts when running apachebench with this patch enabled,
http://www.pastie.org/3002992
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
[sent to rt before, but didn't see it back on the list, so here's
an abbreviated version]
OS: SunOS 5.10
Compiler: SunStudio
As requested on the mailing lists I downloaded
openssl-1.0.1-stable-SNAP-20111209
and tried to compile it on various OS.
It failed on SunOS 5.10 when using Sun's compiler:
Hello,
Please verify http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=21811. Thanks for report.
Thank you, version 1.13 works fine.
Out of curiosity. The bug is in legacy integer-only code path, one that
isn't normally chosen on contemporary CPUs. How did you run into it? I
mean is it very old CPU?
