Re: OS-independent entropy source?

2012-01-18 Thread Andy Polyakov
Come on, having me preparing bootable CF card image for a gizmo I'm not familiar with is unrealistic. Don't you have anything you can compile 10-lines C code and some assembler to add to? Well you mentioned tests on x86 in your paper, I thought you do have some minimal test setup ready for

[openssl.org #2687] OpenSSL 1.0.1-beta1 sends certificate_verify in ServerHello and breaks Java 1.6.x clients, Firefox, and Chrome

2012-01-18 Thread Ivan Ristic via RT
I am testing a Java 1.6.x SSL client against Apache httpd 2.2.21 compiled against OpenSSL 1.0.1 beta 1. The Java client refuses to connect to the server, complaining about unsupported type_15 extension. Network traffic capture shows the server responding to an uninteresting TLS 1.0 ClientHello

[openssl.org #2687] OpenSSL 1.0.1-beta1 sends certificate_verify in ServerHello and breaks Java 1.6.x clients, Firefox, and Chrome

2012-01-18 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[ivan.ris...@gmail.com - Wed Jan 18 14:07:52 2012]: I am testing a Java 1.6.x SSL client against Apache httpd 2.2.21 compiled against OpenSSL 1.0.1 beta 1. The Java client refuses to connect to the server, complaining about unsupported type_15 extension. This is caused by a bug in the

OpenSSL Security Advisory

2012-01-18 Thread OpenSSL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OpenSSL Security Advisory [18 Jan 2011] === DTLS DoS attack (CVE-2012-0050) A flaw in the fix to CVE-2011-4108 can be exploited in a denial of service attack. Only DTLS

Re: OS-independent entropy source?

2012-01-18 Thread Peter Waltenberg
No. For following reason. Originally idea was to attempt to gather OS noise. I mean entropy would come from interrupts, interaction with say DMA, etc. Therefore no explicit attempts to perform the experiment outside OS were made. Besides it would be impossible for me to set it up in most cases

RE: [openssl.org #2620] Resolved: static libs cause crash in linking application on Win64 x64 when built with default (masm) compilation...

2012-01-18 Thread dave via RT
Looks like it is still there in 1.0.0g Again, it's an alignment issue of function pointers put into an array processed by the C-runtime normally used for doing things like global constructors. Its in crypto/perlasm/x86_64-xlate.pl:558 Currently: $v.= READONLY DWORD; Should be: