On 20 December 2013 18:51, Stephen Henson via RT r...@openssl.org wrote:
On Fri Dec 20 19:04:32 2013, d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
I can do whatever you think is most useful, but i need a bit more
guidance to be sure i'm giving you what will be most useful for you.
I've pulled the update
The following bug has been reproduced on RedHat Enterprise Linux with OpenSSL
1.0.1e.
When upgrading from 0.9.8e to 1.0.1e we noticed that a call to PKCS12_parse()
would sometimes fail with the following:
3073869560:error:06065064:digital envelope routines:EVP_DecryptFinal_ex:bad
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014, Salz, Rich wrote:
So Curve25519 needs a standard OID and some notes on the format to use for
ASN.1. Does such a thing exist?
I don't think so. Perhaps the TLS list is the place to discuss this? Should
we (I?) start a thread there on a proposal to fit Curve25519
On 02/01/2014 01:44, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
djb has a fixed-clock-cycle algorithm he wrote in GNU assembly for Athlon.
I am unhappy with his insistence that nobody should try to implement it for
other platforms, as though Athlon is the only platform anyone would ever
need. I agree that a
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 01/02/2014 08:50 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
[Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:]
So Curve25519 needs a standard OID and some notes on the format to use for
ASN.1. Does such a thing exist?
I don't think so.
yes, i mentioned it up-thread:
On 01/02/2014 12:35 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
That's just TLS. To add more complete support to OpenSSL including storing
private keys in PEM files and public keys in case we ever use it in ECDH
certificates it needs an OID and some details on how the keys are encoded.
But ECDHE doesn't
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 12:59:39PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 01/02/2014 12:35 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
That's just TLS. To add more complete support to OpenSSL including storing
private keys in PEM files and public keys in case we ever use it in ECDH
certificates it needs an
On 01/02/2014 03:32 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
On 1 January 2014 21:39, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
On 01/01/2014 12:48 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
Pull requests on Github are quite useful - that way they also get
tracked (so long as we remember to close them when applied, that
On 01/02/2014 03:32 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
On 1 January 2014 21:39, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
On 01/01/2014 12:48 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
Pull requests on Github are quite useful - that way they also get
tracked (so long as we remember to close them when applied, that
On 1 January 2014 21:39, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
On 01/01/2014 12:48 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
Pull requests on Github are quite useful - that way they also get
tracked (so long as we remember to close them when applied, that is!).
OK, i've rebased the series against the
On Mon Dec 30 22:47:32 2013, d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
I don't mean to be impatient -- if it's just a matter of playing catchup
over the close of the winter holiday, i can wait :)
Yes that's pretty much it. I'll be looking reviewing the patches in the next
few days.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen
I just encountered this issue with precisely the same error. It appears with
all configurations including 'no-des'.
1.0.1e tarball
OSX 10.9.1
XCode 5.0.2
# minimal test-case
./Configure no-des
make depend
make
make test
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
12 matches
Mail list logo
