[openssl-dev] Minor bug in custom TLS extensions

2015-08-25 Thread Bill Cox
This seems like a bug to me: /* * If this ClientHello extension was unhandled and this is a * nonresumed connection, check whether the extension is a custom * TLS Extension (has a custom_srv_ext_record), and if so call the * callback and record the

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3930] DOCUMENTATION: dgst.pod: duplicate -hmac

2015-08-25 Thread Rich Salz via RT
Fixed in master, 1.0.2, 1.0.1; thanks. OpenSSL_1_0_1-stable 86de216 RT4019: Duplicate -hmac flag in dgst.pod OpenSSL_1_0_2-stable 8e0b56b RT4019: Duplicate -hmac flag in dgst.pod master fe50cd7 RT4019: Duplicate -hmac flag in dgst.pod Author: Markus Rinne markus.ka.ri...@gmail.com Date: Mon Aug

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4020] #3759: [PATCH] crypto: use bigint in x86-64 perl

2015-08-25 Thread Jean FONGANG DASSI via RT
On Solaris 10u10 X86_64, I had to do the bellow instead: $ cat src/x86_64-xlate.pl_patch --- openssl-1.0.2d/crypto/modes/asm/../../perlasm/x86_64-xlate.pl Thu Jul 9 13:57:15 2015 +++ ./x86_64-xlate.pl_new Tue Aug 25 18:17:20 2015 @@ -194,17 +194,17 @@ } sub out { my $self = shift; - +

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3759] [PATCH] crypto: use bigint in x86-64 perl

2015-08-25 Thread Jean FONGANG DASSI via RT
On Solaris 10u10 X86_64, I had to do the bellow instead: $ cat src/x86_64-xlate.pl_patch --- openssl-1.0.2d/crypto/modes/asm/../../perlasm/x86_64-xlate.pl Thu Jul 9 13:57:15 2015 +++ ./x86_64-xlate.pl_new Tue Aug 25 18:17:20 2015 @@ -194,17 +194,17 @@ } sub out { my $self = shift; - +

[openssl-dev] Intel function stichting support for DTLS

2015-08-25 Thread gaurav maheshwari
Hello, Function stitching support (only for x86 processors) is there for some of the TLS ciphers but same support is not there for DTLS. So, What was the reason for not adding function stitching support for DTLS. Thanks. ___ openssl-dev mailing list To

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4017] [PATCH] Implement Camellia GCM suites (RFC 6367)

2015-08-25 Thread Hubert Kario via RT
On Tuesday 25 August 2015 08:58:57 Hanno Böck wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:32:24 +0200 Hubert Kario hka...@redhat.com wrote: After all the whole heartbleed story can largely be explained by that. I'd propose that OpenSSL doesn't add any new features without a clear explanation

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4017] [PATCH] Implement Camellia GCM suites (RFC 6367)

2015-08-25 Thread Hubert Kario
On Tuesday 25 August 2015 08:58:57 Hanno Böck wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:32:24 +0200 Hubert Kario hka...@redhat.com wrote: After all the whole heartbleed story can largely be explained by that. I'd propose that OpenSSL doesn't add any new features without a clear explanation

Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-25 Thread Ben Laurie
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 19:35 Matt Caswell m...@openssl.org wrote: On 24/08/2015 10:08, Ben Laurie wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 03:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com mailto:rs...@akamai.com wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 at 01:56 Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com

Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL

2015-08-25 Thread John Foley
If you click on one of the individual builds (left side), then click on the Console Output link, it'll show the full build log. You can find the commands issued for the build in this log. On 08/25/2015 05:49 AM, Ben Laurie wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 19:35 Matt Caswell m...@openssl.org

[openssl-dev] ECDSA side-channel attack mitigation

2015-08-25 Thread John Foley
Is OpenSSL planning to implement side-channel resistance against the following attack: https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/161.pdf ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4017] [PATCH] Implement Camellia GCM suites (RFC 6367)

2015-08-25 Thread Hanno Böck
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:32:24 +0200 Hubert Kario hka...@redhat.com wrote: After all the whole heartbleed story can largely be explained by that. I'd propose that OpenSSL doesn't add any new features without a clear explanation what advantage they bring in which situation - and who is

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4017] [PATCH] Implement Camellia GCM suites (RFC 6367)

2015-08-25 Thread Hanno Boeck via RT
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:32:24 +0200 Hubert Kario hka...@redhat.com wrote: After all the whole heartbleed story can largely be explained by that. I'd propose that OpenSSL doesn't add any new features without a clear explanation what advantage they bring in which situation - and who is

Re: [openssl-dev] FW: Website changing this weekend

2015-08-25 Thread Salz, Rich
Do you still want lists of broken links, or is this a general issue you're already aware of. That's good enough. We're aware of a general problem with links in the manpages and are working on it. Other breaks would be good to know. ___

Re: [openssl-dev] FW: Website changing this weekend

2015-08-25 Thread Salz, Rich
Yes, cross-refs within the manpages are still often broke. We're working on that. Thanks to the generous help of Phil Pearl, the links within the manpages are fixed! ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

Re: [openssl-dev] FW: Website changing this weekend

2015-08-25 Thread Ken Goldman
On 8/24/2015 5:55 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: Yes, cross-refs within the manpages are still often broke. We're working on that. Do you still want lists of broken links, or is this a general issue you're already aware of. If you do, from https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/crypto/evp.html